Microsoft looks to beat Google with the desktop

AOL deal loss is not the end of the search affair, says Redmond

NEWS

Microsoft plans to leverage its desktop market dominance to compete with Google on search and advertising, analysts said on Wednesday - despite losing out to Google in the race to become the partner for Time Warner's AOL unit.

After spending much of this year wooing AOL in an attempt to get its search business, the Redmond, Washington, software giant was pipped at the post by Google. Google and AOL announced on Tuesday that Google will invest $1bn for a five per cent stake in AOL under a broad partnership that expands their existing search engine deal to include collaboration on advertising, instant messaging and video.

Google is also offering a $300m credit that AOL can use to buy keyword-based ads from Google, and AOL will be able to sell all types of ads on Google sites and its publisher sites that display ads powered by the search giant. In addition, Google will help AOL better expose its content to Google's web crawler.

But given that AOL and Google have had a search engine agreement for three years, "at the end of the day, nothing much has really changed" for Microsoft, said Michael Gartenberg, an analyst at JupiterResearch. "From Microsoft's perspective, the ability to do a deal with AOL would have been a good thing but it was not a critical thing."

Microsoft plans to integrate desktop search into the upcoming version of Windows, code-named Vista, and eventually extend that to the internet, Gartenberg said. "When search becomes an integrated part of the Windows experience, that will put Google on the defensive," he added.

Microsoft is also expected to gain traction with its brand-new AdCenter pay-per-click advertising service that's being tested and its year-old search engine, said Rob Helm, director of research at independent research firm Directions on Microsoft.

Helm said: "It is definitely a lost opportunity for Microsoft but also Microsoft is looking at this as a long-term process and still has assets to deploy [such as integrated search in Vista]. So Microsoft, in a sense, hasn't really started the competition yet."

Adam Sohn, an MSN director, said the fact the search business is still in its infancy and online ad spending is booming means it is anybody's game going forward.

He said: "Yeah, it would have been nice to bootstrap that [AOL] ad network, sure. But, do we need it? No. This is a long-term strategic bet for us, and we're going to continue on with the plan we have today."

Sohn did not dismiss the possibility of striking a deal in the future, though.

He said: "That being said, we would never preclude ourselves from a partnership that makes sense."

Microsoft could bundle different internet advertising types and pricing together to try to compete with Google's ad business, said Charles Di Bona, an analyst at Bernstein Research. It also could offer minimum revenue guarantees or more favourable revenue-sharing terms, he said.

Di Bona wrote in a research note: "[Microsoft] remains in a better position to sell a bundled internet advertising offering, including display and search, which could be appealing to advertisers as they expand their non-traditional spending and, frankly, feel their way through the issues of mix and methodology in approaching the internet medium.

"We continue to view [Microsoft's competition with Google] to be a prolonged, multi-move game, and while [Microsoft] has slipped in the first few rounds, we expect the company to move into the next round relatively swiftly and most certainly aggressively."

Elinor Mills writes for CNET News.com

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    "When search becomes an integrated part of the Windows experience, that will put Google on the defensive," he added.

    interesting comment, isn't this the monopoly view that caused MS issues around IE and media player? I would assume that the internet part of the Vista desktop search will need to allow any engine to avoid a series of lengthy court cases etc.

    Of course the choice would default to MS and most was would not care enough to change this.

    • 22 December 2005 10:21
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters