YouTube faces copyright claim

Video-share and share alike runs into trouble...

NEWS

Video-sharing site YouTube is facing a lawsuit claiming it encouraged users to violate copyright law.

Journalist Robert Tur says video he shot of the beating of trucker Reginald Denny during the 1992 Los Angeles riots was posted at YouTube without his permission and viewed more than 1,000 times. Tur says in his lawsuit, filed on Friday in US District Court, YouTube is profiting from his work while hurting his ability to license his video.

YouTube said in a statement: "Mr Tur's lawsuit is without merit. YouTube is a service provider that complies with all the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), and therefore is entitled to the full protections of the safe harbour provisions of the Act."

Passed in 1998 to protect copyright holders from technology that facilitated piracy, the DMCA also offered protection to web service providers by limiting their liability in cases where their customers were found guilty of copyright violation.

Those in the video-sharing sector have for months expected someone to challenge YouTube in court. The company lets users post videos to its site without pre-screening them, and a staggering amount of copyright video exists on the site. YouTube prohibits the uploading of such material but has also benefited in the past when someone has posted a professionally made clip that catches fire with the public.

Earlier this year, a skit from Saturday Night Live, called "Lazy Sunday" drew large audiences to YouTube's site and generated lots of media attention before the company pulled the clip at the request of NBC.

Since learning of Tur's suit, YouTube has removed his clip, the company said in its statement. Tur didn't ask that the company remove the clip prior to filing his suit, YouTube said.

Tur is asking the court for $150,000 per violation and an injunction barring any further use of his material.

Greg Sandoval writes for CNET News.com

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    What a horrible, greedy man. $150,000 x 1000

    He's already profiting from someone else's misfortune and he wants to become a multi-millionaire out of it.

    I'm not condoning copyright infringement, but he didn't even ask for the clip to be removed. Probably so that when people heard about the case, more people would view the clip and it would have possibly made him more money.

    I hope he loses.

    • 19 July 2006 10:40
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters