By Peter Cochrane, 25 September 2006 11:50
COMMENT
Written at Copenhagen Airport after a delightfully easy check-in and relaxed period in the airport lounge. Despatched to silicon.com from a free wi-fi site in London the next day.
Over the past few weeks I have been flying in and out of the main London airports of Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted heading to continental and international destinations using a variety of airlines. On each occasion I have been subject to the new security regime inflicted by BAA and the resulting long lines of misery at check-in and security.
Each time I pass the pile of confiscated cosmetics and bottles containing everything from water to wine, milk and shampoo, I can't help but wonder about the necessity and effectiveness of such measures given the amount of passenger angst created and sheer time wasted. BAA staff also regularly assailed me to check, at least three times before security, that I have no fluids, balms or other substances in my pockets or hand baggage.
So far I have been lucky in that my checked baggage has not gone astray and at my distant destination the unloading has been well-ordered with first class and business travellers' luggage arriving first, which is in complete contrast to the baggage handling chaos when arriving in London.
But this is not the only noticeable asymmetry! Such is the general crowding at the London airports, and the new pressure on the security and check in staff, there has been a noticeable rise in the level of rudeness of staff and passengers alike. All very sad but very understandable against the general squalor of the terminal buildings, the long delays on the approach roads and the general tension invoked by the whole process.
Once on the flight side of the line people seem to calm down a little and the general crowding thins out somewhat but the overall inadequacies of the facilities, which are fundamentally too small and outdated, do not help.
What a contrast to the return journeys! With spacious, modern, well laid out and orderly airports, rapid and reliable access by road and rail, polite staff and minimal delays at check-in and security. But best of all, a check-in and security regime of six months ago, with no restrictions on hand luggage, fluids cosmetics and other materials - just business as usual.
Recently I boarded at Copenhagen with my computer bag, my clothing bag, all my shaving equipment, aftershave, deodorant, and medications etc, and carried them onto the plane and loaded into the overhead - no worries. Sure they checked that my bag was regulation size, they X-rayed everything but no baggage search, no questioning, no inconvenience. And this has been repeated on my return journey everywhere I have travelled recently.
Contrast this with my outgoing flight from Heathrow Terminal 4. A 45 minute wait on the approach road getting to the airport terminal, followed by a 20 minute wait to get to the front of the line at business class check-in, followed by a direct threat of being made to wait in line for over an hour to check my bag into the hold via the economy line. Ouch! I actually had to argue to get them to check my bag pronto! This tension maker was followed by a fast-track security line so long that it very quickly became slow-track and led to the usual baggage X-ray and metal detector process.
I was later picked out at random for a full shakedown at the boarding gate where security staff emptied my computer bag and pockets. At this point the weary security staff stared at my intentionally placed lip salve, medication, screwdriver and nail file, only to say: "That's fine sir". I felt like a bit of a magician! If you don't want people to see things, put them right under their nose.
What is happening? Are passengers and flights some form of asymmetric threat? Is my volatile and explosive aftershave on the outgoing flight somehow rendered inert upon my return? I don't get it! I just don't see extra security measures abroad. I don't see any extra technology being applied but I do however see the application of common sense, a lack of political correctness and a targeting of human energy at the most likely targets.
I was never a 100 per cent happy traveller and I am even less so now but to earn I have to fly. And being a technologist I know what technology can do. It never tires or goes to sleep on the job and it can help humans be closer to continuously vigilant.
The only innovation I have seen in the UK is a single iris scanner and I hear that finger print scanners are on the way. We'll hurrah! They have been in use in the US and other countries for a long time.
Hopefully these will help speed up the process and cut down on the angst but I suspect nothing will improve much until an investment is made soup-to-nuts across the board from road and rail to buildings and runways, and all with integrated security systems that give more than a passing glance at customers that have become tired and resigned to the lack of foresight and action.
Real security checking will start way back in society before a booking is made, and will include the roads and rail system right though the pedestrian phase, entry, shopping and seating process. Moreover, much of it will need automation if we are to stand a chance of finding the malcontent and misguided who wish to put everyone in harm's way.



Comments
There are 7 comments. Join the discussion
1. CMylod
The assymetry is the gov's fault. A knee-jerk reaction to a "non-imminent" threat which is full of security thratre and short on efficiency. Same gov let BAA build shops after shops, tolerating the tiny space for airside securiy - but the members of parliament get free parking and zippy checkins so that's all right, isn't it?
LHR T5 should not have been permitted until T1-T4 were upgraded, painted and fixed. Won't be long before T5 is a cramped shed with bolt-ons all over the place, shabby to hell and unpleasant!
2. Jim Price
The whole process could be enormously speeded up by teaching passengers to count up to one (piece of hand baggage)!
3. Philip Townsend OBE
The UK authorities kind offer to"Help other airports in Europe to reach the same high standards as Heathrow" is, in my opinion, disingenuous at best. I live in Bali and travel frequently through Europe to New York. I used to use Heathrow as my transit point in Europe but now will not do so because of the baggage madness. Common sense has to prevail. Of course we must be vigilant but we also need to understand that flying is already the safest form of transport by a long way and that there is no such thing as 100% security. A compromise has to be found which allows travellers to lead a normal lifestyle. Liquids I could come to live without but not hand luggage instead of check-in. Fortunately, AMS/CDG/FR and all US airports see things the same way. British airports and airlines are going top lose business big time very soon. What then? The attitude of UK authorities has put them between a rock and a hard place.
4. anonymous
I have not overlooked the possibility that the major 'threat to our safety & wellbeing', is from the current government & their politically correct lapdogs. Who seem to have charged or prosecuted more indigenous people under the 'new' anti terrorist, soviet style laws than real terrorists. It is all about having CONTROL of the indigenous & basically law abiding population. Which those in positions of pseudo authority seem to take to extremes. Is the 'threat' genuine? Or is it perhaps yet another 'weapons of mass deception' scandal contrived by Tiny Blah, Blah, B's spin doctors?????
5. anonymous
Sorry Peter. I think you have got this one wrong. Agreed the current UK procedures are a pian and they are plain WRONG. How many shoe bombers have been caught in the last 2 years? The nutters have moved on from shoe bombs but our idiot government places more and more inconveniences in the way simply for show - this is security theatre, nothing else. Now lets recall the tragic events of the IRA's UK mainland bombing - did the Govt stop us going to pubs beacuse the IRA blew up a pub in Birmingham? NO. Instead we got on with our lives and real security work took place where it should - via the security services and the Police. The current policy plays into the hands of the terrisists by INCREASING terror. FACT - the Chemistry behind the recent "innocent liquids" plot is so far fetched that it would be virtually impossible to execute in the toilet of plane. What we should be doing is putting more money into intelligence as that is where we get real security from - after all it was precisely that which stopped this recent event being executed.
6. anonymous
as a frequent flyer to the uk from europe i absolutely agree with you.
i flew out of glasgow airport not long ago and was close to losing my temper big time! bag searched, opened, questions etc. etc. and i had nothing prohibited in it.
next time - my mother decided to give me a nail set as a present (wrapped up) and told me there was nothing in it that i couldn´t carry as hand luggage.
passed straight through control - no worries.
was flying out of luton the other day too - what an absolute nightmare
shoes off - questioned - the whole shabang! at least the security guard laughed when i grumpily complained about the whole deal.
7. anonymous
I totally agree with Peter's comments. I recently flew from LAX where the security staff were efficient and polite to LHR where queues for transferring passengers were at least 50 metres in length. This queue got tangled up with passengers arriving in London causing utter chaos, if it wasn't for a helpful member of BA staff directing arriving passengers around the transfers, I would have been delayed for a considerable time. As a footnote, when I got past the transfer queue there stood a BAA security staff member totally ignoring the aforementioned problems. Why can security be handled efficiently at outstations but not in the UK?