NEWS
One of Wikipedia's closest critics and founders is launching an alternative to the free online encyclopedia this week.
Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, says he will launch a spin-off of the free site, called Citizendium. It will include user registration and editorial controls to govern user-submitted articles, unlike the free-for-all submission process that reigns on Wikipedia. With "gentle" controls in place, Sanger says Citizendium will naturally weed out so-called trolls from posting obscenities or biased information.
Sanger said: "Wikipedia is amazing. It has grown in breadth and depth, and the articles are remarkably good given the system that is in place. I merely think that we can do better. There are a number of problems with the system that can be solved, and by solving those we can end up with an even better massive encyclopedia."
Sanger said an invitation-only, pilot version of his not-for-profit site will launch this week but wider release has yet to be determined.
Since early 2001, when Sanger helped get Wikipedia off the ground with co-founder Jimmy Wales, the service has become one of the most popular research tools on the web and one of its fastest-growing sites. But last autumn, concerns over the veracity of Wikipedia articles came to a head after it was discovered that the entry on former Robert F Kennedy aide John Seigenthaler suggested he had been involved in the presidential candidate's assassination.
While Wikipedia has moved to address some of the concerns with new technology, other encyclopedia projects have tried to fill demand for academic information. Digital Universe, for example, launched earlier this year as an expert-controlled encyclopedia project, which was also started with Sanger's help. Its first initiative, called the Encyclopedia of Earth, has 400 articles written and reviewed by volunteer environmental experts from around the world.
Sanger took a leave of absence from Digital Universe to start Citizendium and take a different approach to the online encyclopedia. Like Wikipedia, he wants the service to evolve with public participation - it will be a "fork" of the open source code of Wikipedia, meaning that it will replicate its existing database of articles and then evolve, through user participation, into a new compendium of its own.
But unlike Wikipedia, Citizendium will have established volunteer editors and "constables", or administrators who enforce community rules.
He said: "These so called constables will play a similar role to administrators in Wikipedia but they will not be able to make decisions on how articles read. The editors will be responsible for making decisions about content but they will not be able to ban people."
Citizendium is soliciting experts in their fields to post and oversee articles on any given subject. Another difference from Wikipedia is Citizendium will require members register with their real name to post to the wiki. That, Sanger said, should also discourage shenanigans.
He said: "The idea is we will be inviting people from around the world to work together under the gentle guidance of experts."
Wikipedia representatives did not immediately respond to request for comment.
CNET News.com's Dan Terdiman contributed to this report
Stefanie Olsen writes for CNET News.com
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. anonymous
Although I've contributed three featured pages to Wikipedia, I won't join Citizendium as long as it requires people to reveal their real-world names. Wikipedia has seen instances of real-world harassment. If Citizendium becomes half as successful as Wikipedia it's going to have a much more serious problem.
This article overlooks the similarity of Sanger's project to the unsuccessful Nupedia experiment that preceded Wikipedia. It also overlooks several non-technical solutions that Wikipedia has adopted to address accuracy: the German language edition is experimenting with a stable versions system, the English language edition has adopted a new Disruptive Editing guideline to streamline blocking and banning of problem users, and the Wikipedia 1.0 project is expanding on Wikipedia 0.5's CD release of featured content and important articles. Wikipedia's Expert Retention discussion is brainstorming new ways to make articles more reliable.
While I wish Sanger well, and I've read and sympathized with his complaints, many of those concerns are gettting addressed within the framework of the existing project. The situation at Wikipedia isn't the same as it was when he left the project - and I see gaps in his plan that will likely create projects of equal or greater magnitude for Citizendium.