Firefox developer blasts Google

Is search colossus abusing its position of power?

By Graeme Wearden, 2 January 2007 09:15

NEWS

One of the lead developers behind the Firefox browser has accused Google of abusing its powerful position in the search market to promote its growing range of products.

In a blog posting last week, Blake Ross argued Google is wrong to include plugs for its Calendar, Blogger and Picasa at the top of search results for terms such as 'calendar', 'blogging' or 'photo sharing'.

Ross, 21, who has been one of the driving forces behind Firefox, wrote: "This is clearly bad for competitors, and it's also a bad sign for Google."

As Ross pointed out, many other web companies also cross-promote their services. However, he argued that Google - with its motto of "Don't be evil" - should hold itself to a higher standard.

Ross said: "Google is predicated on the idea that the democratic structure of the web will push the cream to the top. Search for 'photo sharing' and you should already get the highest quality services. According to Google, Picasa is not one of them."

Ross' posting sparked a lively debate on tech website Slashdot. Some posters backed Ross, agreeing users could lose confidence in Google if they perceive it is not giving truly impartial information. Others, though, insisted Google is acting within its rights and treats its rivals fairly.

Graeme Wearden writes for ZDNet UK

Comments

There are 3 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Stuart Fawcett

    I agree Google is abusing its powerful position, eg a java security update contains a pre-selected Google toolbar option, I think this is also an abuse of position and product placement.

  2. 2. anonymous

    However bad Google may be Adobe is worse (even worse than , you update Acrobat reader and they install the Yahoo toolbar at the same time (option not to if you notice it in time).

    This can upset internet settings and stop browsing if you are unlucky.

  3. 3. Bob Gear

    I absolutely hate those toolbars. Yahoo and Google are relatively benign(probably) - but at least they will uninstall when told to - unlike some I have encountered on my users' machines.

    I don't want *any* optional extras pre-selected over and above the update I originally chose to download.

    Installing something extra just because the user didn't notice a checkbox before pressing the button is insidious and wrong.

    Or is it just me being unreasonable?

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ