Google has data-retention change of heart

No more indefinite search logs?

By Elinor Mills, 15 March 2007 08:40

NEWS

Google is changing its data retention practices to make it harder to identify the specific computers used in searches.

Google's servers log information every time someone conducts a web search, keeping data such as the keywords used, the IP address or unique number assigned to that person's computer, and information from web cookies, which are small bits of data exchanged between a server and a web browser each time the browser accesses the server. Cookies are used to authenticate the user and maintain information such as the user's site preferences.

Currently, Google maintains the search data logs indefinitely. Under the new policy, which it expects to have fully implemented by the end of the year, the company will make the final eight bits of the IP address and the cookie data anonymous after somewhere between 18 and 24 months, unless legally required to retain the data for longer. The information on specific searches will remain indefinitely but it will be much harder to tie searches to specific individuals or computers.

The company said: "Logs anonymisation does not guarantee that the government will not be able to identify a specific computer or user but it does add another layer of privacy protection to our users' data."

The policy change will apply to future web search data as well as archived logs and all copies of the data stored on other servers, Google said. Users will be able to opt out of the practice and request that their search data be maintained indefinitely.

Privacy advocates in general said Google's policy change is a step in the right direction but not nearly enough to really protect web searchers from overzealous law enforcers. Keeping the search histories could enable investigators and governments to get to all sorts of personal information about people, they argue.

Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said: "I don't think the Google proposal is adequate. This period is too long and it's not in fact data destruction, it's more data de-identification, and that should be happening in 18 to 24 hours, not months. I'm not persuaded that this isn't still a ticking time-bomb for Google's search engine."

Richard M Smith, an internet security and privacy consultant at Boston Software Forensics, said Google should never be archiving the IP address and cookies on servers. "Google should not be in the spy business," he said. "By logging IP addresses and search strings they are running the largest intelligence operation in the world."

Anonymising the last eight bits of the IP address effectively would enable investigators to narrow the IP address down to 256 possible computers or users.

Ari Schwartz, deputy director for the Center for Democracy and Technology, said: "For most average consumers that is pretty much anonymous," because many people connect to the internet through large companies that dynamically assign IP addresses, making it even harder to determine exactly which person conducted a search. "It is a risk but it is better than what we have today."

Kevin Bankston, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said he would like to see Google scrub the entire IP address within six months but praised the company for making this "positive first step".

He added: "We hope other online service providers will heed this example and work to minimise the amount of data they keep about their customers."

Google said it can't anonymise the entire IP address, delete it altogether or anonymise any of it sooner than 18 months because it needs the data to analyse usage patterns and diagnose system problems. For example, it uses the information for fraud detection and prevention and to combat denial of service attacks which can temporarily cripple or shut down servers.

Nicole Wong, deputy general counsel for Google, said: "Knowing what country a user is coming from helps us figure out whether or not we are delivering the right search."

Elinor Mills writes for CNET News.com

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. BillK

    Maybe the bad publicity from the privacy people has irritated Google.
    But perhaps they have also noticed increased traffic via blackboxsearch.com which makes Google's IP address tracking useless.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ