Peter Cochrane's Blog: When will the net become intelligent?

It's only a matter of time - and it's our only hope

COMMENT

Written in a garden at Lower Ufford, Suffolk, surrounded by wildlife on a beautiful sunny day, and dispatched to silicon.com via an open wi-fi signal provided by some kind and sensible person

At a modest estimate the internet has the aggregate memory and processing power of about one human brain. This growing capacity seems to be doubling at about six-year intervals. So there is only one question to ask: why is it so dumb?

Before you reach for you keyboard to point out that we can't accurately assess the ability of the human brain, and I may therefore be a factor of 1,000 or more out, just think on exponential growth:

2006 internet ~ one human brain
2012 internet ~ 1,000 human brains
2018 internet ~ 1,000,000 human brains
2024 internet ~ 1,000,000,000 human brains
2034 internet ~ 1,000,000,000,000, human brains

It will happen, one way or another.

Unfortunately intelligence is one of those words for which we can assign no description, definition, quantification or indeed any degree of real understanding. It is something we all recognise and talk about but don't really understand. Here is my take on the 'intelligent' internet ranked in order of 'vital' quality:

  1. A sensory system
  2. Processing power
  3. Memory
  4. An ability to output and influence the environment of occupation

So here I am surrounded by countless carbon life forms spanning the simple to the complex, whilst my laptop has to make do with my fingers as the input or sensory system. Of course this may be expanded to include the built-in camera and microphone but without the deserving impact we might expect of such sophistication. And the output? Just a screen and loudspeaker, plus of course a connection to the net. No physical actuators, no 'touchy-feely'.

As for processing and memory power, I have as much as money can buy but along with the software it is bolted down, static, unable to adapt to circumstance and input. It's not surprising then that this lump of hardware, fundamentally more capable than any insect and most rodents, is just a passive dumb lump of silicon, copper, gold, aluminium and plastic.

No wonder the internet is also dumb as it is made from an assemblage of the same technology. But will this situation go on much longer? Perhaps not! Sensors and other devices are being coupled to the net in their millions day-on-day. And adaptive software is being produced and let loose. In essence the internet is becoming a rudimentary ecosystem in silicon.

So when will the internet become intelligent and when will intelligence, and even life itself, spontaneously erupt?

My guess is it is only a question of time. Even if we do nothing more than continue to build at the current rate, and keep bolting on more and more sophisticated sensors, plus adaptive software, then something will happen. The snag is we might not spot it or, most likely, we won't be smart enough to spot it - and we most likely will not recognise the potential value.

Personally I look forward to an extra intelligence to compliment our own. To date we use teams of male, female and every colour, creed and educational discipline to power up our organisations and problem-solving teams. But it is a model that is already exhausted and struggling to deal with many of our more complex problem sets, and we will certainly not cope with what is coming down the pike.

Fundamentally we need a different view and capability beyond our own to deal with the complexity we now face.

Weather, trading, pharma, medical, energy, physics and network systems have already demonstrated our shortcomings, and the realisation that conventional computing and computer models will not do the job is just dawning. Intelligent machines look to be our only hope!

Comments

There are 6 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Jeremy Wickins

    There was a one-off TV drama in about 1999 (Millenium bug panic time) about this happening, using much the same argument as its plot-line. Of course, it was not a good thing - humanity made slaves to something that had derived its intelligence from a high proportion of porn and violence. Note to IT manufacturers ... better start hardwiring Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics into all servers!

    • 23 May 2007 19:07
    • Add comment
  2. 2. Radical Meldrew

    Peter,

    Whilst I fully endorse the enhanced sensory experience, I feel a little uncomfortable with the additional application of intelligence. Even though I am a dedicated ‘techy’, I feel that the web should remain as a powerful tool to enhance human capability, not replace it.

    I would not feel comfortable following a sedentary course because technology is now capable of doing things for me, but without foresight, I probably would embrace it wholeheartedly in the short term. The real danger here is that we could all take this easy option, losing our motivation along the way – the same ingenuity that created this fantastic technology is now capable of dumbing down further inspiration. Historically following the leader, in this case a mechanised one, is a frequently recognised human trait!

    I will admit that humans, like machines, occasionally break down – but humans, unlike machines, usually exhibit lots of tell-tale symptoms beforehand and seldom ‘crash’ without warning. I rest my case for all us organic based thingamajigs.

    I know this might sound a bit Orwellian but in reality it could happen. Long live the web as a benevolent friend but, please, not a life-long supplement to living!

    Compulsory Warning: Reading this email does not alter your statutory human rights and no machines were injured in the course of its production.

    • 24 May 2007 02:35
    • Add comment
  3. 3. John Foster

    I only hope they start with automated phone systems and program in the ability to respond to the caller saying 'Please speak much, much faster' and 'I am not interested whether you are recording this and I am not interested in any of your other products - move on'

    • 27 May 2007 08:53
    • Add comment
  4. 4. Peter Cochrane

    Radical Meldrew

    I think we actually lost all control a long time ago. We are all part of an evolutionary path that could even be called eGaia. And it is getting harder and harder to separate man and machine on all levels.

    The next 50 years are going to be really interesting!

    Peter

    • 29 May 2007 14:05
    • Add comment
  5. 5. Peter Cochrane

    John Foster

    Only techno/marketing/sales/management geeks could come up with such a dumb interface and then inflict it on everyone else!

    Peter

    • 29 May 2007 14:08
    • Add comment
  6. 6. Peter Cochrane

    Jeremy = The real worry is that so far we haven't worried about wiring the 3 Laws into the robots on assembly lines etc...and there seem few inclined to do so. But sooner or later it will become an issue. Peter

    • 29 May 2007 14:14
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters