By Peter Cochrane, 26 March 2008 10:00
COMMENT
Written on JetBlue 0038 flying from JFK to Rochester NY, and dispatched via a free hotel wi-fi service.
When I was a child there was no television. Radio was strictly LW, MW and SW. My oldest children can remember black-and-white TV but there were no colour services, nor were videos, PCs, mobile phones or broadband available.
Careers advice from Tessa Hood:
You won't get promoted looking like that
But by contrast, my youngest can only remember having everything, including computer games.
He has always enjoyed a rapidly growing range of technologies and content delivered direct to his computer screen. Yet today he doesn't own a radio or a TV.
We now have in our midst a new generation who are becoming radio- and TV- free. They don't posses the collection of boxes dedicated to one media alone.
Instead they opt for a do-it-all solution - the PC or laptop. Such a trend poses interesting questions for the future, especially when in some countries public broadcasting is funded by a levy or licence on the basis of TV ownership.
In the UK, for example, the BBC is funded by licence fees paid by some 24 million households, plus hotels, pubs, restaurants and offices.
Payment is ensured by a tracking system linked to the TV sales process and by detector vans that patrol areas where houses fail to register.
TV detection is through the tell-tale emissions of the local oscillator, which can be easily detected by a sensitive receiver with a directional antenna.
So what actually happens? The homes of young people who don't have a TV licence receive a visit from the detector van people. When they scan the building they can't see a TV set, so they conduct a search of the premises, and that's that. The occupants then go back to watching TV over the internet - and all for free.
This is all a bit of a blunder. It threatens the generation of content and the provision of a valued service. So, what's the answer? One thing is certain is that it cannot be policed or stopped.
Exclusive column: The Naked CIO
See what this CIO really thinksÂ…
The Naked CIO: Boadroom stereotypes
The Naked CIO: IT staff disloyalty
The Naked CIO: Cut the bull
The Naked CIO: Animal farm
The Naked CIO: Offshore - or off their trolley?
The Naked CIO: Shadow of the job axe
The Naked CIO: Identity crisis
The Naked CIO: Innovation - same old story
Clearly a new business model is required but if recent history is anything to go by that is unlikely to happen quickly.
I'd put my money on human stupidity taking over and a PC viewer witch-hunt being declared, along with ISP controls to stop it all and preserve the sacred cow of old.
In recent years the BBC has enjoyed an estimated 350 million viewers worldwide via the web - all funded by 24 million UK households. The obvious thing to do was to support this through either subscription or advertising.
Unfortunately the BBC charter doesn't allow this and so open access was the default. A bit of a shame. All that was needed was a recognition that new models are not only possible but indeed absolutely necessary for long-term survival.
Changes in society brought about by technology always invoke challenges. The trick is to make change work for society and not against it.
In my home there are boxes, lots of boxes. But I find myself watching less and less TV, listening to more and more radio, and of course spending more time on the web.
As the youngsters are already there, it seems that the rest of the population are likely to gradually drift that way. I can only see very difficult times ahead for broadcasters.
The last big media move on this scale was caused by MP3 technology. It amply demonstrated the fundamental inability of an established industry to change its business model.
The net result was a near-death experience for the old music industry. Sadly, I see an entrenched broadcasting industry in danger of going in the same direction.
Comments
There are 10 comments. Join the discussion
1. James Edgecombe
As a stop-gap the UK might wish to consider adopting the licence fee collection solution used by France whereby it is bundled in with the Tax d'Habitation - equivalent to council tax. But I fear such a move might prove unpopular.
Certainly, as an Brit living abroad, I would not hesitate to pay a subscription fee - even the full licence fee, in fact even more than the full licence fee - if it enabled me to receive UK programming outside British borders legally.
As it is, Sky's satellite service allows pretty much all of Europe to watch UK programming illegally whereas the BBC iPlayer is blocked to all those without a UK IP address.
The precedent has already been set. Clips on the BBC website are accompanied by advertising when viewed from abroad. Given the choice I would rather pay a subscription fee and receive the full gamut of programming without any ads.
2. Karen Challinor
"I'd put my money on human stupidity taking over and a PC viewer witch-hunt being declared, along with ISP controls to stop it all and preserve the sacred cow of old"
Yep. When in doubt go for the knee-jerk solution. I'll put my money on stupidity winning too.
Stupidity is easy.
3. Ben Ingledew
I expect we will get some kind of campaign with a variation on the old slogan
"Home taping is killing music" just relating to TV this time.
Just like that old campaign it will fail.
4. Richard
The TV licence is about control rather than revenue.
The licence should be abolished and a much slimmed-down public service broadcasting should be supported by a grant from general taxation.
The BBC should also be made more directly accountable.
There is no justification for the current grossly unfair "poll tax" type TV licence or for the extraordinary powers granted to the aggressive collection mechanism run by the BBC.
5. Peter Cochrane
James: This is a sentiment I hear very often. Peter
6. Peter Cochrane
Karen: dare I say it? Stupidity seems to be on the up and really comes very naturally to a lot of people. Peter
7. Peter Cochrane
Ben: It usually needs the near wholesale destruction of an established model before anyone recognises the need to change. It will be quite a fight. Peter
8. anonymous
I agree that the model needs to change to reflect the developing technologies.
However, there is a need for an independent public sector broadcaster in the UK, especially in a political climate where every terrorist action or threat of action is met with a further erosion of civil liberties.
9. ROBIN LANE
If you contract a UK IP address, would it then be possible to watch the BBC abroad?
10. Karen Challinor
Robin Lane - "If you contract a UK IP address, would it then be possible to watch the BBC abroad?"
It may be possible to bypass the country check by using an IP anonymising service as used by whistleblowers to hide their identity.