RFID could disrupt medical devices, say researchers

Wireless tech fails to get clean bill of health

NEWS

Radio frequency ID (RFID) technology can interfere with medical equipment, according to a study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association.

The study by six Dutch scientists has found electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by the track and trace chips has the potential to cause disruption to medical devices - which could be a potential hazard to patients.

RFID tagged wristbands are currently used in some hospitals to ensure correct procedures are carried out on patients. But the future of healthcare is likely to involve far more RFID-style tech, according to a recent report by Ofcom, which included a prediction that in-body and on-body wireless networks could become the norm over the next decade for monitoring patients.

The Dutch scientists looked at both active (i.e. info transmitting) and passive (i.e. requiring a reader device) RFID systems and found 34 'incidents' were triggered out of 123 EMI tests - of which 22 were classed as hazardous, two as significant and 10 as light, according to a critical care adverse events scale. The average distance between the RFID reader and the medical device in all the EMI incidents was 30cm.

Passive RFID systems caused more incidents than active signals: 26 incidents in 41 EMI tests (63 per cent), compared to eight incidents in 41 EMI tests (20 per cent).

A report abstract states: "In a controlled nonclinical setting, RFID induced potentially hazardous incidents in medical devices. Implementation of RFID in the critical care environment should require on-site EMI tests and updates of international standards."

The tests took place during May 2006 at the Academic Medical Centre in the University of Amsterdam using an active 125kHz RFID system and passive 868MHz in the proximity of 41 medical devices in 17 categories with 22 different manufacturers. Three tests were carried out on each piece of medical equipment.

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Roger Huffadine

    Why is this news - its obvious - always has been - I just wonder why it took so long for the medical engineers to get their voice heard.

    • 26 June 2008 17:59
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters