By Marguerite Reardon, 27 June 2008 11:12
NEWS
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) voted Thursday to relax rules for naming websites.
At its meeting in Paris, Icann, a not-for-profit organisation that oversees the naming scheme for websites, voted to accept a proposal that will allow companies to purchase new top-level domain names ending in whatever they like.
CIO50 2008: Top 10
The UK's leading CIOs revealedÂ…
1.Robin Dargue Royal Mail
2.David Lister Royal Bank of Scotland
3.Neil Cameron Unilever
4.Catherine Doran Network Rail
5.John Suffolk UK government
6.Gordon Lovell-Read Siemens UK
7.Paul Coby British Airways
8.Tania Howarth Birds Eye Iglo Group
9.Simon Post Carphone Warehouse
10.Ben Wishart Whitbread
So, for example, instead of being restricted to sites ending in .com or .org., eBay could have a site that ends in .ebay, or New York City could end its we site with .nyc.
The new naming process will begin in 2009. The first suffixes are likely to be given to businesses and other major organisations. Countries are expected to keep their specific suffixes but, as in the example above, cities could also get individualised URLs, such as .london or .chicago.
In an effort to deter 'cyber squatters', the organisation is likely to charge a hefty price for the new names. Some experts estimate the new domain names could cost anywhere from $50,000 to $100,000 or more. Icann plans to give companies with trademarked names priority for their names.
The group also voted to open public comment on a proposal that would allow countries to use non-English script. For example, companies could use Chinese or Arabic script to identify their websites.
Paul Twomey, the chief executive of Icann, told the BBC earlier this week that allowing the new naming conventions would create new "real estate" on the internet. But some experts worry it could unleash a gold rush mentality. While trademarked names will only be available to those trademark holders, there are loads of common words that people could want to register, such as .sex.
The suffix .xxx was rejected by Icann last year but it could also prove to be a popular suffix under the more relaxed policy. Still, Twomey told Agence France Press that the organisation will still try to block or reject any domain name it deems inappropriate for security or moral reasons.
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. John Sniadowski
I wonder why it is such an organisation as ICANN thinks it has the right to censor anything let alone figure out all the nuances of linguistic abhorrence across cultural boundaries. It is the beholder that is affronted not everyone, we all have the ability to decide what we like or dislike.