By Nick Heath, 4 September 2008 16:53
NEWS
The Labour chairman of an influential technology group has warned that government plans to monitor UK email and internet records could collect to much data to be useful.
Home Office proposals that will see records of phone, email and internet communications - including VoIP - to be kept for 12 months are expected to cost taxpayers up to £68m to set up and £39m per year to run.
Andrew Miller, chairman of the parliamentary information technology committee, cast doubt on the value of requiring ISPs to hold such a vast amount of information, saying the data would be too broad to be useful.
It follows an earlier admission by a Home Office spokesperson that the information would be of little use in tackling organised crime, as serious criminals will be able to disguise their communications.
The proposals have already faced harsh criticism from privacy campaigners and opposition political parties, while Information Commissioner Richard Thomas recently spoke out against plans to retain communications records in a centralised database.
Miller said: "The worry that I have is the sheer practicality of being able to manage that data in a meaningful way.
"Keeping everything from everyone might seem like a good idea but you have to face up to reality of what the hell are we going to do with it."
According to consultation papers released in August, the government wants to keep the "who", "when" and "where" of communication to "assist in the investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime".
UK security chief at Microsoft and former top cyber security agent for the FBI in the UK Ed Gibson raised similar concerns about the scale of the proposals.
Security from A to Z
Click on the links below to find out more...
A is for Antivirus
B is for Botnets
C is for CMA
D is for DDoS
E is for Extradition
F is for Federated identity
G is for Google
H is for Hackers
I is for IM
J is for Jaschan (Sven)
K is for Kids
L is for Love Bug
M is for Microsoft
N is for Neologisms
O is for Orange
P is for Passwords
Q is for Questions
R is for Rootkits
S is for Spyware
T is for Two-factor authentication
U is for USB sticks/devices
V is for Virus variants
W is for Wi-fi
X is for OS X
Y is for You
Z is for Zero-day
"I think you have to be very careful of how much data we require anyone to store. There is then the matter of data mining that information you have retained," he told silicon.com.
As of last September, telecoms providers are obliged to keep all text and phone call records for between six months and two years following an EU directive. The Home Office proposals will bring the UK in line with this requirement, extending the monitoring requirement to include all online traffic by 2009 at the latest.
A Home Office spokesperson said: "This data is a vital tool. Communications data allows investigators to identify suspects, examine their contacts, establish relationships between conspirators and place them in a specific location at a certain time.
"We have worked with CSPs (communications service providers) to ensure they can store data retained under the EU directive in such a way that it can be accessed to provide a timely response to RIPA (Regulation of Invesitgatory Powers Act) inquiries.
Comments
There are 3 comments. Join the discussion
1. Charles Smith
Labour politicians will learn the cost of not controlling the snooping ambitions of their "public servants" at the next general election.
These controls are an excessive intrusion into the privacy of the british public.
The British Computer Society should be much more vociferous on this issue. It has lost another chance to to make its mark in the public arena.
2. Adrian Carey
Well said Charles.
As a nation we seem to be sleepwalking into the most oppressive future.
3. Karen Challinor
so they want to gather each and every piece of hay on the world and sift through it one piece at a time looking for bits that might be needles
rather than say, finding a magnet for example
and this will be at huge expense, which of course you and I will pay along with everything else in this recession we surprisingly find ourselves in, rather than the labour party themselves funding it
but if they have to spend billions it will of course be worth it if just one person is prevented from dropping litter or allowing their pet to foul the street
which will be the main result, as I've said on many occasions, criminals and terrorists who are in the least bit tech savvy will be able to stay off the radar with relative ease
while you and I end up with cameras recording our every move for posterity, just in case a future government decides to make one of our currently innocuous actions a crime and charges us retrospectively, please don't tell me that it can't happen or I'll ask you to tell me what future governments will do in precise detail .. oh and next weeks lotto numbers would be nice too