Peter Cochrane's Blog: Synthetic people

Soon you won't know man from machine

COMMENT

Written on KLM1515 flying from Norwich to Amsterdam and dispatched to silicon.com the same day via a company wired LAN

I've just been looking at avatars and synthetic people over the past 15 years and must say the progress that's been made is very impressive - from the 'blocky and doll like' mannequins we currently see on social websites to the characters appearing in Hollywood movies alongside real actors.

It seems to me the real breakthroughs have been in the realm of body dynamics, skin and hair rendering and, most of all, building in human imperfections. Non-symmetrical faces and bodies, pock-marked skin, hair that is uneven and individually tapered, colour and texture variations and ugly movement seem to carry the day.

I have always held that it is our physical and mental imperfections that both define us and make us interesting, and it certainly seems to be the case with our facsimiles!

Only five years ago the perfect skin and movement of the synthetics instantly gave them away. Today they are standing in for real people during movie action scenes involving serious dangers or impossible acts for real humans. Soon I suspect they will be replacing actors in more sedentary scenes - and I can see the possibility of a whole new genre with movies, TV shows and adverts totally populated by synthetic people.

Such a possibility would of course leverage the latent talent of those 'undiscovered' by Hollywood and break the mould of an industry first cast in the 1920s.

I think I can safely predict the first industry to adopt, adapt and perfect this technology will be the purveyors of porn. They are always on the cusp of the technology wave, and have both the money and motivation to try out new things.

Next I reckon synthetic people will be used for advertising. Of course the really interesting developments in this area will be the usual 'stage left entries' created by those working out of bedrooms or garages.

Other uses for this tech will include interfaces with machines, as well as medical and other personal services.

The big challenge will soon be: is it a real or synthetic person I am conversing with? To answer this we may soon need a second Turing Test capable of detecting the presence or lack of real humanity.

One upside is that we might feel a bit better about being beaten at chess by a machine that is less handsome or pretty than we are. Or more generally, those who feel uncomfortable interfacing with machines may feel at peace talking to a human-like face, whilst some might not even notice it is a machine at all!

How long for all this to happen? I reckon a decade should see it all as commonplace!

Comments

There are 9 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Haydn Rees

    If I have the choice of waiting 5 minutes in "call waiting hell" to speak to an operator (which becomes 20 minutes), or talk to a computer straight away which can do something useful for me immediately, the Turing Test has changed.

    It is no longer "Can I tell the difference?"; it is "Do I care?"

    • 12 November 2008 11:33
    • Add comment
  2. 2. Chris Knowles

    What a horrible scenario. Thank heavens for live theatre.

    • 12 November 2008 14:16
    • Add comment
  3. 3. Richard

    I'm reminded of the early days of synthetic speech:

    Some speech systems sounded incredibly "artificial"...

    Until you heard their designers talking!

    • 13 November 2008 11:19
    • Add comment
  4. 4. Peter Cochrane

    Hadyn = I'm with you - just solve my problem fast - and I'm not too concerned what form the agent takes! Peter

    • 14 November 2008 16:32
    • Add comment
  5. 5. Peter Cochrane

    Chris = But man cannot live by live theatre alone! And even live theatre includes clowns and puppets...Peter

    • 14 November 2008 16:33
    • Add comment
  6. 6. Peter Cochrane

    Richard = Yep - I can think of a few people who could do with a personality chip implant! Peter

    • 14 November 2008 16:35
    • Add comment
  7. 7. Peter Cochrane

    Richard = Yep - I can think of a few people who could do with a personality chip implant! Peter

    • 14 November 2008 16:39
    • Add comment
  8. 8. Gary Hinson

    Hi Peter.

    The Web is an excellent place to release and develop a Turing machine. Almost all Web interactions are inhuman for a start. I mean *I* know I'm real but how do you, simply by reading this inane comment? And likewise how do I know *you* are real? More importantly, does it even matter anyway?

    Of course I could turn on my Web cam to show you I am a real person. Oh wait, no, that won't do will it?

    Judging by some of the responses we see on mailing lists, I believe there are already robots out there, quietly building their knowledge bases and practising their social skills.

    :-) G

    • 14 November 2008 19:48
    • Add comment
  9. 9. Peter Cochrane

    Gary = I sometimes meet robots with better social skills than some of the people in the industry! Peter

    • 18 November 2008 10:10
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters