By David Meyer, 16 December 2008 08:30
NEWS
Virgin Media has finally launched its long-anticipated '50Mbps' cable broadband service but analysts have warned the headline speed may not be attainable for very long.
The £51-per-month service, which Virgin claimed will be available to all of its 12 million customers by the end of next summer, was unveiled on Monday. The company aims to have the service available to 40 per cent of its customers - in "areas in Scotland, the Midlands and south London" - by the end of 2008, according to a statement. Virgin Media's previous top speed was 20Mbps.
Broadband from A to Z
Click on the links below to find out more...
A is for ADSL
B is for BT
C is for Cable & Wireless
D is for Dial-up
E is for Education
F is for Fibre
G is for Goonhilly
H is for HSDPA
I is for In-flight
J is for Janet
K is for Kingston
L is for Landlines
M is for Murdoch
N is for Next generation
O is for Ofcom
P is for Power lines
Q is for Quad-play
R is for Remote working
S is for Satellite phones
T is for Trains
U is for Unbundling
V is for VoIP
W is for WiMax
X is for Xbox
Y is for YouTube
Z is for Zombies
Virgin Media chief executive Neil Berkett said in the statement: "Today marks a historic moment, for both Virgin Media and the UK. As the first ISP to roll out next-generation broadband access, our 50Mbps service represents the dawning of a new era of high-speed services in the UK, and is just the beginning of what we hope to offer our customers over the coming years."
Virgin Media's 50Mbps service uses a combination of fibre and coaxial cable technologies. The core network is fibre, and fibre often connects the exchange to the street cabinet. However, unlike a true fibre-to-the home (FTTH) setup, the connection between the cabinet and the premises uses coaxial cable, similar to the cable that plugs into the back of a television set. Virgin's speeds are, therefore, much faster than the 24Mbps maximum speed promised by rivals such as Be Broadband and BT, but not as fast as those that would be possible with FTTH.
Broadband analyst Ian Fogg, of Forrester, told silicon.com sister site ZDNet UK on Monday that the launch of Virgin Media's 50Mbps service is significant not only because it makes Virgin's the fastest consumer broadband service in the UK, but also because it will spur investment in competing, true fibre networks. He particularly pointed to BT's July announcement that it would roll out fibre to 10 million homes by 2012, at an estimated cost of around £1.5bn.
Fogg said on Monday: "Until someone builds a fibre network, [Virgin's 50Mbps service] will continue to be the fastest network in the UK. This launch is one reason BT made the announcement regarding its fibre investment. Hopefully [Virgin's announcement] will drive Virgin Media's competitors to invest in their networks."
Noting the fact that Virgin Media is essentially the end result of mergers between smaller cable companies that had differing qualities of infrastructure, Fogg said the "real question" is how quickly Virgin can roll out its new, higher speeds across its whole network.
A spokesperson for Virgin Media told ZDNet UK on Monday that the ISP's own tests had suggested 50Mbps customers could expect to receive "at least 45Mbps, 80 per cent of the time". Fogg warned, however, that customers would be unlikely to get that sort of speed for very long.
"There has been a lot of discussion in the press, the Advertising Standards Authority and elsewhere around the impact of the telephone line on the speeds of ADSL broadband [as offered by Virgin's competitors]," said Fogg. "The real issue is that, whichever broadband package consumers choose, including Virgin Media, which doesn't use the phone line, the speed someone gets is also related to how many other people are using the service, and Virgin Media has exactly the same problem there as everyone else."
"It is very hard to say what speed people will get, because that will depend on the success Virgin Media has with getting people to sign up," Fogg said. "The more sign up, the more pressure there will be on the network, and the more likely consumers are to get a lower speed. If someone signs up immediately, they might find the actual speed is [close to 50Mbps], but, in six months' time, they might find less capacity is available." Fogg added that cable services can suffer even greater drops in speed, due to the number of people using the network, than DSL services.
Another issue noted by Fogg concerns the disparity between download and upload speeds. "Networks such as Virgin Media find it much harder to deliver faster upload speeds than other technologies like fibre broadband or even some ADSL packages," he said. "While 50Mbps is the peak download speed, upload speed is much lower. If anything, there is a greater asymmetry than there is with many other broadband packages on the market."
Fogg also suggested that Virgin Media's traffic-management policies may affect the actual speeds that are delivered to customers. "In the past, Virgin Media has had traffic management which has altered speed based on how heavily someone is using the service in just one evening," he said.
"They have also quite frequently altered how they manage the network, so a consumer may sign up and commit to a particular contract period and, over time, the way Virgin Media manage the service will change. It is hard to say precisely how that will operate for the lifetime of the contract. Only Virgin Media really knows what its plans are, in terms of how they will manage capacity on their network and how intrusive they are with network management," said Fogg.
Virgin Media's spokesperson told ZDNet UK that the 50Mbps service would launch "without traffic management", but such management would be introduced "at some point in 2009" when Virgin takes stock of "how customers are actually using the 50Mbps service".


Comments
There are 8 comments. Join the discussion
1. Richard Davies
I will put my neck on the line and state that this 50Mb speed is non-sense if we're honest.
Some of the backbones between different countries aren't 50Mb in size (the internet is worldwide and not just contained within Virgins own fibre network!) and so the speed you receive will be depend on so many other conditions (alot of which Virgin won't be able to control) that you will probably find yourself not getting what you pay for.
If I was paying so much for an advertised 50Mb service, I would demand SLA's be in place and have software in place analzying the traffic and would ensure that Virgin delivered what they say they can.
I like the idea of the service and it will spur others on with the end goal of eventually replacing the coax last leg with fibre as well to create a true FTTH solution...my trouble its with one of the most interferring ISP's out there!
2. misceng
Speed is not the only criteria that matters. I have had Cable & Wireless which became NTL then Virgin Media. What made me break from Virgin finally was support. With increasing frequency and length of breaks in a "2Mb" broadband service that gave 350kb. I would call support at an ever increasing cost to be told that it was my email client that was at fault (not true). All I could do was wait until they eventually found the fault in their equipment. With another supplier I now get 7Mb with no breaks at less cost.
3. tim
I would rather have a higer upload speed so I would pay £50 a month for
20MB Down and 10 MB Upload and proper fixed IP or even £100 a month for 2mb leased line with a £1500 install as I am an on net customer
4. Steven Courtney-Crowe
All very well if you have cable past your door. How about those of us who don't? I guess we'll just have to wait for BT to play catch up. I get the full 8Mbps in the office, and very rarely see that anywhere near saturation, so I'm not sure what use 50Mbps will be other than from VM's own networks.
I agree with Tim, more upload please ISPs!
5. Karen Challinor
until BT decide to replace the copper cable coming to my home with a fibre cable I will be stuck on ADSL as no amount of pleading, cajoling or offers of money will get any other provider to lay a cable
6. Richard Sarsonr
I have been on Telewest-Virgin since 2001 with hardly a break, say once a year. I get 9.7 mbs download and 500k up at the moment. I think Virgin is great.
What's more, the cost of 50mbs seems little more than what I pay at the moment. Bring it on.
7. anonymous
I have had a 50meg Virgin connection for a while now, I was one of the users given the free modem to test. I get 34 meg and at that it is very impressive with downloads, though normal use on Google, EBay etc. is not changed. It's very good having up to 50meg available, but until the rest of the web is up to it, it's an experience I can do without
Paul
8. Leigh Thompson
I have been traffic managed 20 times since April because I upload too much, my 20mb line is 5mb (uploading 1.5gb). Virgin Media T&C says they will notify me when this happens, guess what I never got. I like the comment there will be no traffic management in 2009 - isn't that when it rolls out to the rest of the UK?