NEWS
On Tuesday, Ofcom published the final version of its report into fixed broadband speeds, finding that the average download speed for a UK subscriber has increased since the preliminary results were released in January.
January's preliminary results showed an average speed of 3.6Mbps. That average is now 4.1Mbps but the average 'up to' advertised speed is 7.1Mbps. According to the telecoms regulator, the majority of consumers are happy with the speeds they receive but 26 per cent of those surveyed complained they were not getting the speeds they had expected when they signed up to their ISP.
Ofcom's research was carried out between November 2008 and April of this year, and encompassed more than 60 million performance tests in more than 1,600 homes. The researchers found that those living in urban areas got faster speeds than those in the countryside - on average 4.6Mbps as opposed to 3.3Mbps. Overall, only nine per cent of customers on a standard 'up to 8Mbps' package got speeds above 6Mbps, with 19 per cent getting less than 2Mbps.
Read this
A-Z of Broadband
- A is for ADSL
- B is for BT
- C is for Cable & Wireless
- D is for Dial-up
- E is for Education
- F is for Fibre
- G is for Goonhilly
- H is for HSDPA
- I is for In-flight
- J is for Janet
- K is for Kingston
- L is for Landlines
- M is for Murdoch
- N is for Next generation
- O is for Ofcom
- P is for Power lines
- Q is for Quad-play
- R is for Remote working
- S is for Satellite phones
- T is for Trains
- U is for Unbundling
- V is for VoIP
- W is for WiMax
- X is for Xbox
- Y is for YouTube
- Z is for Zombies
The ISP Association (ISPA) responded to Ofcom's report on Tuesday, saying it "supports the intention of Ofcom to give consumers detailed, robust information about broadband speed performance". However, ISPA pointed out that the survey did not cover small UK ISPs, and said the research "does not reflect the breadth of the industry".
"Whilst the research does serve to provide information for people wishing to choose a provider, ISPA urges any future research to ensure that a greater share of the market is covered to provide a more complete assessment for consumers," ISPA secretary general Nicholas Lansman said in a statement.
ISPA praised Ofcom for highlighting the factors that can affect a user's broadband speeds: typically, distance from the exchange, the condition of the phone line and the quality of wiring in the house.
Price-comparison site moneysupermarket.com said there were concerns consumers were being misled over speed when buying broadband packages. "Often they're lured into buying high-speed connections when the reality for millions is the infrastructure simply cannot achieve the speeds being promised," broadband manager James Parker said in a statement.
Parker also noted that "downloading and streaming through sites like iPlayer and Spotify mean that people are hungry for more bandwidth".
The Communications Consumer Panel, meanwhile, argued for ISPs to advertise their average speeds, rather than theoretical maximum speeds. "Effective implementation of the government's universal service commitment is vital; consumers will expect minimum speeds of 2Mbps," panel chair Anna Bradley said in a statement. "No amount of up-to speeds will do the trick."







Comments
There are 5 comments. Join the discussion
1. Phil Thane
The issue in many parts of the UK isn't average speed, however that is calculated, but the speed when you want to use it. My average, during the day is about 3-4Mb/sec which is fine. But high contention ratios soon drag it down.
Once the kids come home from school and start downloading, listening to Spotify and watching Youtube it drops. Youtube is impossible on Saturday and Sunday afternoons. Listening to Spotify in the evening makes using the web for anything else painfully slow.
ISPs should quote the minimum speed they deliver for say 99% of the time, the 1% is a safety margin for hardware failure. On that basis my guaranteed speed is about what it was 10 years ago, 30kbps.
2. MARTIN LUKES
If Ofcom think the average broadband speed is 3.6Mbps they could try coming to Suffolk, where the alleged "broadband" download speed if 472kbps and the upload speed is slower. Ofcom will do nothing to contradict BT whose useless antiquated third world state-subsidised infrastructure is the cause of this. And yes, I do know BT was privatised and no, the lines here have not been replaced since then. Why bother? It's only a rural area and we have no right to know what's going on outside, not that we'd want to.
3. Dave Brown
The big cable companies cannot use the "distance from the exchange" excuse. Despite a news report saying Up To 10Mb Virgin Media customers on average get 8.7Mb, I have a directly cabled (no wireless) Virgin Media modem on my cable service (with an above spec PC) and only get 5.7Mb - any time of the day.
Obviously VM didn't even answer my online complaint to them. If you are considering cable as a way of ensuring getting what you paid for - think again.
4. Plymouth Dave
Having read the article & comments I thought I would have a see what my speeds are, of 5 different tests 4 gave between 5.5 & 6.3 but Money Supermarket gave 1.1?
5. Plymouth Dave
Having read the article & comments I thought I would have a see what my speeds are, of 5 different tests 4 gave between 5.5 & 6.3 but Money Supermarket gave 1.1?