Microsoft patches patch system

"Patch management is a pain point," Microsoft has just realised

NEWS Responding to customer complaints, Microsoft says it plans to simplify its patch technology and to expand its automatic update service to include more products. In a white paper released late on Wednesday, the software giant identified four areas where it plans to make improvements over the next 12 months: in patch quality, in delivering information to its customers, in broadening the number of applications supported by its automated update technology and in simplifying the way that patches are applied. "Customers tell us that patch management is a pain point," said Jeff Jones, senior director of trustworthy computing for the company. Last November, customers complained that Microsoft labelled too many of its security patches as "critical," leading the company to create the new, less severe category of "important" for security problems that can be handled at a later date. On Tuesday, the company also announced that it will consolidate from eight to two the number of ways that patches are distributed to customers. Jones said the simplification will be only one of several steps that Microsoft will take to improve its patch-management tools for customers. The company plans to create a Windows Server 2003 guide for improving security, to update the security-bulletin search function on its TechNet Web site and to host conference calls to brief customers when a new advisory is released. Microsoft also intends to make it easier for customers to uninstall any patches that go wrong, Jones said. Moreover, the company will, over the next 12 months, create an automated update service that extends to other Microsoft products, not just to Windows. Both the company's Software Update Service for small and midsize businesses and its Systems Management Server 2003 for large corporations will include the feature. Jones reiterated the company's pledge to reduce the number of technologies used to patch systems. The proliferation in the number of technologies had occurred because Microsoft urged each product group to come up with a patch, he said. "There are seven different business groups at Microsoft, and they were encouraged to" come up with new products, he said. Back then, "that was the right tradeoff, and now, consistency is the right tradeoff." Robert Lemos writes for CNET News.com

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters