Microsoft to patch patch for IE

'Critical' fix in the wings...

NEWS Microsoft will release a cumulative patch for Internet Explorer at the weekend, plugging a security hole that had been used by Trojan horse program QHosts to compromise consumers' PCs. The patch - the fortieth that Microsoft has issued this year - seals several security holes in Internet Explorer 5.01, 5.5 and 6.0 for all versions of Microsoft Windows. The giant deemed the patch critical to all versions of Windows, except Windows Server 2003, which runs with more security in its default installation. The patch repairs a previous patch that didn't properly protect against two ‘object type’ vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities have been exploited by Trojan horse QHosts to compromise people's PCs when they browse a website that has attack code built in. "An attacker could seek to exploit this vulnerability by hosting a specially constructed web page," Microsoft stated in the advisory. "If the user visited this web page, Internet Explorer could fail and could allow arbitrary code to execute." That's exactly what happened at FortuneCity.com, when an unknown attacker was able to replace a banner ad on the site with code that copied the QHosts program to any computer that viewed the page with Internet Explorer. The program doesn't attempt to spread itself, so it isn't considered a computer worm or a virus. Microsoft has been sued by a Los Angeles resident for its handling of security patches and for allegedly putting customers at risk by not offering proper security for its Windows operating system. Robert Lemos writes for CNET News.com.

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. peter simonitsch

    it just shows how such companies act. take any risk not following the simplest development roules within sotware development, spend not suficient time on reasonable testprocedures and criticise people hurt by the consequences. they should debugg MS software at their costs but certainly not publish it. its the same manner like the IP's act. they deploy any rubbish via their networks and servers but take no rebonsibilities for it. the user pays anyway the service and for the fee he gets spam, worms and troyans. there is no customer support-organisation taking sonsumers party against that business practices.

    • 2 December 2003 18:45
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters