Security education: Too little too late

Whitehall is way behind on getting consumers up-to-speed on web security

COMMENT What is government doing to educate end users about online threats such as viruses and spyware? Not enough, says Simon Moores, and the efforts that are underway did not appear soon enough.

"You don't want to open that Pandora's box, because you never know what Trojan horses will leap out" --Prime Minister Ernest Bevin

It's now over three years since the government started to recognise that it needed to address the problem of consumer internet safety. In fact, to be accurate, you can add another 18 months between the slow dawning of recognition and actually being told that the wheels were in danger of falling off if they continued to sit on their own hands and leave the matter in the hands of industry.

"The problem," said one highly placed civil servant during a meeting at the first eCrime Congress in London, "is that the Treasury won't give us any money and we're unlikely to get any budget until April of next year."

'Next year', by the way, was 2004.

Now more than halfway through 2005, a public-private partnership aimed at reducing cyber crime, originally called Project Endurance, has reappeared as a safety campaign called Get Safe Online. It's focused on improving internet security for small business and consumers.

Don't mistake me, this is a good thing but it was supposed to have been launched in October of last year and I have to ask how many millions of pounds have been lost or identities stolen as a consequence of internet-related crime while attempts were made to find a budget from private sector partnership. In this case, the generosity of Dell, eBay, HSBC, Lloyds TSB, Microsoft and Yell will match a £150,000 grant from the government.

In October, one or even four years late, depending on how you view it, a www.getsafeonline.com website will be launched with government and business support. The site will offer expert advice in plain English on how to fight viruses, spyware and phishing-driven identity theft.

More than 15 million people now have broadband internet access. The value of the internet economy to the Treasury continues to grow rapidly with ecommerce sales in 2003 alone worth around £40bn, according to the ONS.

Meanwhile, the cost of computer-related crime in 2004 grew to £2.4bn, according to the National Hi-tech Crime unit (NHTCU) survey, which reveals only the tip of a much larger iceberg because there's no true figure on what it costs consumers (such as the £350 I lost once due to eBay fraud).

Startled into action by news that 25 per cent of the world's remotely controlled PCs are found in Britain, government has managed to find £150,000 to contribute to a campaign that it should have taken responsibility for several years ago. I'll quote the then e-Envoy Andrew Pinder, speaking at a New Statesman-sponsored roundtable exactly two years ago, when I put it to him that with rapid broadband adoption, we were facing a significant problem ahead.

"Things are actually a lot better than they were three years ago. There's a lot more ecommerce happening on the internet. All our surveys say that people are more confident about using the net than they were three years ago. More people are doing a lot more transactions online, and we are not seeing significantly increased fraud," said Pinder.

Pinder continued: "Let's stop saying, 'There's no leadership, it's all terrible, it's far worse than it was'. There needs to be a proper debate about what should be done. To throw everything back into the lap of the government and say, 'Until government does something, it isn't going to get any better' - that's a load of cobblers."

Get Safe Online, then, is a last ditch effort to turn back a tsunami which everyone apart from government could see coming years ago. In some respects, there's an analogy with the threat from domestic terrorism; in both cases there's a refusal to face the facts mitigated by a small amount of furious activity once it's too late to remedy the problem.

Like the threat from terrorism, most of us are only too aware of the risks presented by internet crime but it may be a little too late, with more than half the population now online, to launch a campaign and for government to present the impression that the matter is now under proper control. It's not. It never was and four years too late, Pandora's box will not be closed that easily.

Comments

There are 3 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Richard Barrington

    Sun were invited to join but after highlighting one of the best ways of addressing the issue was software diversity rather than monoculture for some reason the interest slipped away.

    For almost nothing the Government could put up a listing of open source applications such as Mozilla ( as recomended by NISCC then suppressed ) rather than taking money from the companies who either are the 'root cause' or have a vested interest in selling stuff to fix the issue.

    • 22 August 2005 19:38
    • Add comment
  2. 2. Simon Moores

    Actually and for clarification, I'm informed that GetSafe was planned to be launched "earlier" this year but the funding and organisational exercise started in October of last year. I'm not sure that this gets government off the hook as the article suggests. "Fiddling while Rome burns" is the political analogy which springs to mind and without the help of industry, nothing at all would have happened I suspect!

    • 23 August 2005 11:36
    • Add comment
  3. 3. Incredulous

    Deep pockets - short arms!
    Just GBP150k from just two of the nation's biggest High Street banks, only one of the world's largest most profitable PC manufacturers, one of the world's most popular online dot.com auction sites, the planet's largest software vendor and one online info provider - is that the best that the internet world can offer to protect its own customers from internet fraud and identity theft. While I'm glad they did contribute, what percentage of their combined annual post-tax profit is THAT?! 'Peanuts' comes to mind. And as for the rest of the internet world, well I guess we all know what greedy bast**ds they are! £150k from these companies is chicken feed from their PR budgets, not a serious online attack counter-threat measure. They - and all the other internet dot.coms, IT vendors and service providers - should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. Not surprisingly then that more on-line shoppers are wary of the internet for such activities involving PayPal, eBay and on-line banking. They can't even stop scams and spams being mailed out in their own names!!!

    • 24 August 2005 23:10
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters