By Tom Espiner, 11 July 2006 09:15
NEWS
Icstis, the body that regulates premium-rate phone services in the UK, is to bring in tough new guidelines which will make network operators responsible for checking contractors' backgrounds.
The move is an attempt to cut down on fraud, such as the notorious rogue diallers that have tricked many dial-up users out of hundreds of pounds.
Scams involving premium-rate services including rogue diallers - pieces of software that a user unknowingly downloads on to their computer that secretly reroute a modem connection via a premium-rate telephone number - are being perpetrated by "electronic muggers", according to Icstis.
The new Icstis Code of Practice, which will come into force in September, is designed to reduce "electronic mugging", according to Icstis chairman Sir Alistair Graham.
Speaking at the launch of the code of practice on Monday morning, he said: "My priority is to stamp out electronic muggers."
Graham said: "The new Code of Practice puts the emphasis on the network provider to perform proper due diligence on their contractors, which should reduce the possibility of fraud."
Network providers which do not check their contractors to weed out "bad merchants" will become liable for any fines imposed by Icstis for bad practice or fraud, plus liable for refunding those consumers who suffer fraud.
George Kidd, director of Icstis, said: "Due diligence is not nuclear physics," and claimed some fraudsters have been using names that are clearly fictitious.
He added: "It's not difficult not to sign up people named after cocktails, for example. It stands to reason to check out 'Mr Pina Colada'."
Currently network operators such as BT voluntarily police potential fraudsters, but Icstis wants more "effective statutory ability", said Kidd.
Although Icstis saw a 75 per cent drop in complaints last year, after it was granted stronger powers to fight fraud, the regulator still wants to "stimulate collective action in the telecoms industry" to "drive crooks out of the market", said Graham. "Consumers can unwittingly have money squeezed out of them because of lack of transparency about which numbers are premium rate," he added.
As well as the new Code of Practice, Icstis said it will work with the telecoms industry to educate consumers about scams or bad practice, and is seeking to enhance its relationship with the police by "understanding what their needs are", in providing quality of evidence, and speed in evidence gathering.
The regulator also wants to react to the increasing technological convergence within the telecoms and paid-for-content broadcasting markets, to cut down on future fraud.
Graham said: "It would be folly to think the criminals of tomorrow won't abuse the innovations of today."
Kidd said: "We've seen a remarkable fall in the number of complaints but we're dealing with the tip of the iceberg of infotainment."
Kidd said communications regulator Ofcom was due to review the scope of Icstis' powers in the autumn, and that he would personally be pushing to widen its regulatory scope.
He added: "I want to get away from 'premium-rate service' to [regulating] paid-for services and content. Basically, anything that appears as content on your telecoms bill. I have an interest in data charging, say for music downloads. The price has to be clear. Consumers may know what the download vendor will charge but they can't know what the service provider will charge for the bandwidth. This is not acceptable."
Tom Espiner writes for ZDNet UK
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. Jim McKillop
It's good to see this type of practice receiving some attention, although I am dubious about asking the providers to shop their own customers.
One area that is neglected is Personal Numbers. My wife and I in the last two weeks have received calls from 070 numbers (which belong to Switch Services Ltd) that immediately ring off prior to answering. We have enough knowledge not to call back the number (at 50p per minute).
I'm not sure other people will have the same knowledge.
On trying to find out where to investigate this I was stumped. ICSTIS only do 090 and OfCom don't investigate specific complaints of this nature. I suppose I could have gone to Trading Standards.
Perhaps something you could make your readers aware of.
Thanks and keep up the excellent site.
Jim McKillop
Project Manager