NEWS
The Information Commissioner's Office has said it has concerns about Google's Street View and thinks the company could be breaching data-protection law.
The Google service, which was first made available to a European audience last Thursday, shows 360° views of streets as a part of the Google Maps application. The service has been available for more than a year in the US but now takes in this year's Tour de France route. Street View is likely to be introduced to the UK as well.
Tech Hotspots: The list
1. Silicon Valley
2. Bangalore
3. London
4. Tokyo
5. Boston
6. Cambridge
7. Shanghai
8. Tel Aviv
9. Seoul
10.Beijing
11.Chennai
12.Pune
13.Singapore
14.Helsinki
15.Moscow
16.Hong Kong
17.Hyderabad
18.New York
19.Sydney
20.Shenzhen
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) told silicon.com sister site ZDNet.co.uk that it will be in touch with Google over concerns that people will be too easily recognisable, especially as the face-blurring technology it uses to protect people's identity is not yet 100 per cent accurate.
An ICO spokesperson said: "We will be contacting Google about visibility, and about the contactability of the people in the photos. We will be asking Google whether it will be following its US model [where faces are blurred and those pictured can have themselves removed]. There could be privacy concerns if the people are identifiable, because the images are available to anyone who can log onto the internet. We will be looking at what [laws and regulations] Google could be breaking before speaking to them."
The ICO was also waiting to hear from Simon Davies, the director of Privacy International, over his concerns that Google's face-blurring technology did not blur everyone's faces on Street View.
Davies told ZDNet.co.uk on Tuesday that Privacy International had been in touch with Google to request "full disclosure of the technology specifications for the promised face and number-plate blurring system". However, according to Davies, the search giant has refused to divulge details of the technology on proprietorial grounds.
Davies wrote to Google: "The reason we asked for technical specs for Street View face blurring (and hopefully more quantifiable information) was to ensure that everyone could be assured that the system worked to a reasonable expectation, and that there would not be circumstances, perhaps unforeseen, that might lead to exposure. We do understand your concerns about proprietary aspects. Nevertheless, this should not prevent publication of a more expansive overview of the system and the details of any trials that it has undergone."
The letter from Privacy International was in response to a letter from Google's senior privacy counsel, Jane Horvath, in which she outlined Google's position on its face-blurring technology.
Horvath wrote to Davies: "As with all such systems operating at this scale our blurring technology is not perfect - we occasionally miss a face or licence plate, for example, if they are partially covered, or at a difficult angle. However, we tested the technology thoroughly before launch and I am confident that it finds and blurs the vast majority of identifiable faces and licence plates. For the few that we miss, the tools within the product make it easy for users to report a face or licence plate for extra blurring. As always, users can still ask for their image to be removed from the product entirely."
