IBM rubbishes rivals in $200m ad campaign

IBM has declared war on its rivals Oracle, BEA, CA and Microsoft with an aggressive $200m marketing campaign.

NEWS The campaign, to be launched on Monday, will push the relative merits of its products and IBM has taken the stance that if that means making unfavourable comparisons with Big Blue's arch rivals then so be it. Comparative adverts are commonplace in the US but they are rarely used in Europe. The campaign, to promote IBM's enterprise management software, Tivoli, the messaging applications of Lotus and IBM's own database DB2 and ecommerce suite, WebSphere, is being run by international branding agency Ogilvy & Mather. At first the campaign will be fairly generic, depicting two 'codernauts' that come to earth in search of some decent ebusiness software, but within a month IBM will turn up the temperature, until the adverts become product specific. Lou D'Ambrosio, vice president of marketing for the software group at IBM, said: "If it makes sense to the buyer of a database and if it is important to do so, then we will provide pointed comparisons." D'Ambrosio used a specific example: "Twice the power of Oracle." IBM will also compare Lotus to Microsoft Exchange, WebSphere to BEA WebLogic and Tivoli to CA Unicenter TNG. "We certainly have the data to do so if we choose," added D'Ambrosio. IBM is aware that aggressive advertising may not work in the same way across all geographical regions and the campaign may be tapered to the attitudes of local customers according to the feedback from focus groups in Japan, Germany, the UK, the US and other countries. Attention to local regulation is also of "paramount" concern. Rod Banner chairman and CEO of Banner corporation, the marketing communications subsidiary of WPP, said: "If you've got good products, tell the world. People spend a lot of money on technology and have received too much fluff for too long. Aggressive communication benefits the advertiser and the customer. "Advertising in the technology industry is getting more aggressive, based on the need to build share in a static market, suffering from over capacity." By Andy Favell

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters