More Linux lawsuits on the cards from SCO

And it could be you getting that lawyer’s letter

NEWS Linux antagonist SCO Group vowed Tuesday to widen its legal battle against the open source operating system, saying it intends to sue large-scale Linux users for copyright infringement.

CEO Darl McBride said the company had signed an agreement with the law firm of David Boies, already handling SCO's case against computing giant IBM, to include Linux-related copyright cases. SCO plans to begin filing suits within the next few months, targeting large companies with significant Linux installations.

To date, SCO's legal battle has focused on alleged breaches in IBM's contract to use the Unix code that SCO owns. IBM, one of the biggest corporate proponents of Linux, came under attack from SCO early this year when the software maker filed a $3bn lawsuit accusing Big Blue of illegally incorporating SCO-controlled Unix code into Linux software distributed by IBM. The case has gone on to challenge the foundations of the Linux movement, with SCO promising to bill Linux users and threatening legal action against companies and individuals who don't pay licensing fees.

SCO has since backed off the billing plan but the company is still serious about enforcing its copyrights, said Chris Sontag, senior VP in charge of SCO's legal efforts. He said lawsuits targeting Linux users will be filed within 90 days, with initial suits targeting 1,500 companies with significant Linux systems.

McBride added that lawsuits likely will be preceded and possibly prevented by communications offering businesses an opportunity to get right with SCO. "We'll be communicating with users what our expectations are," he said.

McBride said it's appropriate to start targeting end users now, rather than waiting for the IBM suit to be concluded, partly because the copyright cases will be much less complex than the IBM dispute and should give a much quicker judicial perspective on SCO's claims.

"I think it'd be good for all of us to get some closure," he said. "ISVs [independent software vendors], end users, customers - they all want this cleared up."

McBride was in Las Vegas to deliver a speech at the Computer Digital Expo, a new Jupitermedia event competing with the more familiar Comdex. McBride used the speech to lay out his objections to the general public licence (GPL) that governs many open source software releases.

In an interview before the speech, McBride said the GPL helped create the Linux user lawsuits SCO is preparing by putting all legal responsibility on the user, rather than the companies distributing the software.

"The structure of the GPL pushes the problem down to the end user," he said. "You start out with Red Hat or IBM but it ends up on the end user."

McBride said that besides being weak on copyright protection, the GPL runs counter to basic business principles.

"The GPL-based products have to come to grips with the realities of business," he said, blaming GPL products for "grinding away at the value" of competing commercial software. "It's a tremendous problem and it's getting bigger."

McBride said in his speech that SCO shouldn't get the blame for putting the GPL at risk, however, he maintained that it was IBM's countersuit against SCO that brought the issue to a head. "The GPL is definitely at risk," he said. "But we're not the ones who put it there. IBM put the GPL in the line of fire." McBride went on to predict major changes in open source software, with market forces favouring those who innovate for profit.

"We are in a tug-of-war between those who believe software should be free and those who think proprietary licensing is OK," he said. "When you look at what drives an economy, it's capitalist principles."

David Becker writes for CNET News.com.

Comments

There are 11 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Barry Walker

    So, Darl, you think you're going to charge me for a product that you haven't even proven was yours? PLEASE send me an invoice! Do you know the name Tom Reilly? Here's his website: http://www.ago.state.ma.us/

    • 19 November 2003 16:25
    • Add comment
  2. 2. Alan Chandler

    This story ONLY tells SCO side of the story. Why doesn't it make any reference to anything other than what SCO is saying? In particular, we have seem plenty of assertions that they are going to do things, but no evidence of anything has been forthcoming.

    Take a look at www.groklaw.net for detailed analysis of all of this FUD - and then perhaps a balanced picture might emerge

    • 20 November 2003 11:21
    • Add comment
  3. 3. Peter Risdon

    One for the conspiracy theorists: I remember Caldera received an unspecified amount of damages from Microsoft in an out of court settlement a few years ago - the litigation had been over the effect on DR DOS (which Caldera had purchased from Novell) of bogus error messages built into Windows 3.11. Caldera then bought SCO, presumably with this money.

    It would be interesting to know the full terms of the secret Caldera/MS settlement.

    • 20 November 2003 12:46
    • Add comment
  4. 4. Kevin Polley

    How is this justified when SCO have not even proved thier claim.

    It smells like a plot to get those unable to afford a legal battle to pay a 'settlement' fee.

    Then I can see that SCO will use the fact that 'others' have paid as a justification for the original claim.

    When SCO do lose the fight, will they then refund those people who did pay? - ummm

    • 20 November 2003 12:52
    • Add comment
  5. 5. Mark Solomon

    In other words: -

    "we wanted to get some money out of IBM, but that might take some more time than we hoped. We have to generate some cash, so let's see if we can get some suckers at the end-user level to fund the initial dispute, so that we can then go after all of them for real"

    It would be laughable, if it wasn't so sad and transparent.

    • 20 November 2003 14:17
    • Add comment
  6. 6. anonymous

    It's like this. Send me an invoice, I will uninstall Linux and install Solaris. No problem.

    • 20 November 2003 15:44
    • Add comment
  7. 7. anonymous

    Hey, just tell us which parts of our linux installations are in doubt and we'll stop using them until it's resolved, even if that means us rewriting.
    Or are SCO claiming that the whole of Linux is theirs now if the allegation holds up?
    They may as well claim that any machines running linux belong to them too.

    • 20 November 2003 15:57
    • Add comment
  8. 8. Richard Ash

    SCO claim somne code was incorporated into some versions of Linux via IBM. It happens I have the source for my Linux installation. Would they like to prove their code is used on my system and therfore that I have to license it?

    I was under the impression it related to multiprocessor machines anyway, so affects a limmited part of the total linux installation base.

    • 20 November 2003 16:57
    • Add comment
  9. 9. anonymous

    Santa Scrooge Operation?

    • 20 November 2003 19:56
    • Add comment
  10. 10. anonymous

    I think anyone who has an invite to the SCO briefings over the next few weeks should boycott them as sign of solidarity to the GPL.

    • 21 November 2003 13:22
    • Add comment
  11. 11. James L. Neill

    Another one for the conspiracy theorists: I seem to remember reading somewhere that SCO had been bought by a company with Microsoft connections. The tone of the SCO language is eerily reminiscent of M/S style used when commenting on licensing and innovation issues. Could anything that destabilises the Linux community be of potentially interesting to Microsoft?

    • 22 November 2003 18:08
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters