Half of small firms want to ditch Windows for Linux

Bad day at the Office for Microsoft...

By Munir Kotadia, 8 December 2003 15:50

NEWS One in four small companies are testing Linux, and half of them hope to use it as their core operating system in place of Windows, according to a survey by IBM.

The companies surveyed believe the open-source operating system will not only save them money, but will be more secure, stable and flexible.

However, the move away from Microsoft is also being assessed by both medium-sized and large organisations.

Microsoft has enjoyed absolute dominance in the desktop market for more than two decades, but there are signs that the company's stranglehold may have peaked, as both small and large organisations seriously consider alternatives. Windows is not the only loser in this evolution, as Unix and other platforms, such as Novell Netware, also face being replaced.

Unsurprisingly, smaller companies find it easer to adapt to new platforms and have been among the first to embrace Linux because they have a relatively simple migration path and can realise any benefits very quickly. TTS, a UK-based shipping company, has just twelve employees and recently began moving its systems to SuSE.

Dougie Bryce, TTS's director, said the company had grown dramatically over the past few years and needed to upgrade some systems to keep better track of freight. He said TTS decided to use Linux with IBM xSeries servers because it was a more flexible and efficient combination.

"Linux frees us from being tied to a single hardware or software vendor and helps us reduce costs. We can adapt our IT systems to suit our freighting business requirements as needed. Without such a move there is no doubt we could not have coped as efficiently with our growth," he said.

Research group IDC said last week that between July and September 2003, there was a 16 per cent rise in Linux server shipments in terms of spending, and a 32 per cent increase in terms of units. This compares to a 5 per cent increase in spending on Windows and a 26 per cent increase in Windows units. The figures indicate significant discounting of the Microsoft products.

The survey published by IBM claims that one in four companies with between 100 and 1,000 employees is currently using Linux, and half of them are expecting it to become their core operating system. However, a time frame for migration was not given.

Nick Davis, Linux x-Series sales manager at IBM, told ZDNet UK that the small business market used to be very concerned about switching to Linux, but with more support from large software vendors and hardware manufacturers, they have become more willing to take a chance:

"Applications from the likes of SAP, Sage and Peoplesoft are coming out for Linux, so there is a lot more confidence now."

Davis said that Hill House Hammond, an insurance broker with more than 200 retail outlets in the UK, was one of the UK's first medium-sized companies to make the move to Linux, and has since enjoyed significant cost savings.

"Under the old regime, they had one technical person for every 50 employees because they needed someone in each of their shops to do the administration, reboot the servers etc. etc. Now, they have one technical person for every 500 employees," he said.

Davis explained that although experienced Linux engineers may be more expensive than their Microsoft counterparts, companies that switch over to Linux don't need as many. "Their time is spent developing applications and moving the business forward rather than maintaining, supporting and keeping the old system up and running," he said.

Munir Kotadia writes for ZDNet UK

Comments

There are 10 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Andrew Smith

    One factor in migrating to Linux is the availability of development tools for creating bespoke applications, and on Linux there is not so much choice. Omnis Studio is one, there must be others.

  2. 2. anonymous

    Interesting how many non-technical IT managers seem to be making their IT decisions based on absolute cost as opposed to TCO. These people have entirely missed the point that Linux is absolutely useless in a larger business environment due to the total absense of a Directory Service.

  3. 3. anonymous

    Interesting that the other comments here indicate a lack of development tools (for Linux? There is an embarrasment of choices out there, Kylix, Eclipse, Emacs, etc) and a Directory Service (Novell eDirectory, OpenLDAP? AD isn't the first or only directory service). These highlight one of the main barriers against change, that people simply are used to someone coming and selling them something. Its not that it isn't there for Linux its just that the developers of such applications have nothing to gain by harranging you to use them.

    Use Linux or don't, its your choice, but lets not compound the FUD.

  4. 4. Graham

    The fact that it isn't Windows will, by its very nature, stop the casual business user, from installing the latest games, applications and other goodies from the latest PC mag CD.

    And as the machines are there for work purposes, it seems to be a great way of keeping a system 'clean' !

  5. 5. anonymous

    IBM must be looking at the wrong half (probably the financial half and only then because the up-front costs are low.)
    Myself, Going Linux? no chance. It's too easy to B***er about with. And that means the "hidden" costs go balistic.

  6. 6. Dr Who

    The small business owner considering migrating their desktops to linux must be very brave or without much IT experience.

    I say let them install linux and find out the true costs involved in running it. Let us teach every pc user how to use a terminal window. Anyone using linux will tell you that command line applications rule. Perhaps too, we will get them to use punch cards containing software logic and reintroduce long batch jobs.

  7. 7. Phil Thane

    I b*****r about with Linux at home just to learn about stuff, but one thing I discovered quite quickly is that it is easy for the official b****r aka the system manager or 'root' to make it impossible for the ordinary user to anything other than what you want.

  8. 8. anonymous

    Funny, we use Linux with Active Directory/Kerberos and have no problems. Single sign-on and all....

  9. 9. Jim G

    Half of small firms WANT to ditch Windows for Linus. It doesn't mean that it will happen today, but it means they are looking into it and will when it makes sense for them to do so. The small firm I work for has switched its server and is looking into the desktops, but it is difficult to overcome the installed base of software that runs on Windows. Master Cam, Inventor, Protel 99SE, ..., run under Windows and have accumulated alot of user knowhow. I doubt if they run under WINE.

  10. 10. Sysadm

    Hope you don't mine this. The Anonymous user who said:
    "Funny, we use Linux with Active Directory/Kerberos and have no problems. Single sign-on and all....",

    If you could please let me have the instructions to do the same. We are are trying to do the same thing here. But are facing some problems. We tried as much google as one can.

    Thanks in advance.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ