Microsoft users addicted to older Windows

'Typhoid Mary' OS could be virus writer's dream

NEWS Microsoft can stop selling older operating systems, and it can even stop supporting them, but that doesn't mean that customers won't still use them.

Even though Microsoft said this week that it will stop distributing Windows 98 at the end of this month, a new study shows that a substantial number of businesses, both large and small, are still using it.

The study, released this week by technology consultant AssetMetrix, found that more than 80 per cent of companies still have some machines using Windows 95 or Windows 98. Of those companies still using the older operating systems, an average of 39 per cent of desktops were running either Windows 95 or Windows 98.

"We found a significant occurrence of Windows 9x," said Steve O'Halloran, managing director for the research arm of AssetMetrix. The study looked at 372,129 PCs from 670 companies ranging in size from 10 to 49,000 employees.

The size of the business did not seem to dictate how prevalent the older operating systems were, with larger companies as likely as smaller ones to have a high prevalence of older operating systems. In total, Windows 95 made up 14.7 per cent of operating systems, and Windows 98 made up 12.5 per cent. Windows 2000 was the most common OS, running on slightly more than half of machines, while its predecessor, Windows NT4, was still used on 13.3 per cent of desktops.

Windows XP, the most current version of Windows, was found on just 6.6 per cent of the machines.

Consumers are also still widely using Windows 98. Google reported that 29 per cent of searches done in September came from machines running Windows 98, as compared with 38 per cent from Windows XP-based PCs and 20 percent from Windows 2000 machines.

The survey comes as Microsoft announced that it will stop distributing Windows 98 and several other older software titles at the end of this month. Microsoft also plans to end extended support for Windows 98 in mid-January, meaning that only web-based self help will be available.

The company's policy would not ordinarily call for Microsoft to provide any security-related patches, but in an emailed statement, the company said it would evaluate future threats as they emerge.

"In addition to the robust set of third-party security products we encourage all Windows customers to use, including antivirus and firewall products, [after 16 January] we will evaluate malicious threats to our customers' systems on a case-by-case basis and take appropriate steps," Microsoft said.

Windows 95 has already passed through the online self-help stage and has been designated "end of life," while Windows NT4 Workstation is scheduled to hit that point 30 June, 2004.

The changes to Microsoft's support and distribution of Windows 98 raise some issues for companies. AssetMetrix, which is in the business of helping companies move to new operating systems, said it recommends that all Internet-connected computers be upgraded from Windows 98 to a more modern and still fully supported OS.

One of the main issues, O'Halloran said, is the security risk internet-attached PCs running the older OS pose.

"Now, there is a way to get into the infrastructure," he said. "Your buddies down the hall on Windows XP or Windows 2000 might be fine, but you become the Typhoid Mary for the company."

There are also lesser issues related to the fact that Microsoft is halting the distribution of Windows 98 as a result of a settlement with Sun Microsystems regarding Microsoft's Java. As part of the settlement, Microsoft agreed to stop distributing software containing the Microsoft Java Virtual Machine by 2 January, 2004. The company got an extension that allows Microsoft to support such software through 30 September, 2004, but officials said the company still has to stop distributing the software by January.

The end of distribution does not necessarily mean that companies cannot install Windows 98 on new machines. Those that have the disks and have certain volume-licensing agreements with Microsoft can use the OS on new installations.

Both Microsoft and outsiders expect the impact of the end of distribution to be minimal.

"I don't think it's going to mean much for anybody," O'Halloran said.

Tony Goodhew, a Microsoft product manager, stressed that the software giant is not trying to force customers to upgrade. But he said small businesses and consumers who depend on the older OS should make sure to keep a copy of the operating system.

"If the dog goes and eats your DVD, that could be a problem," Goodhew said.

Scott Warren, a nursery owner Kentucky in the US, said he uses Windows 98 for both personal and business purposes, although he does not directly connect his Windows 98-equipped business machine to the internet. But Warren said that not offering security patches for older operating systems would hurt all computer owners.

"Most [Windows 98 users] are probably like me and do not intend to be coerced into spending several hundred dollars every three years or so," he said in an e-mail. "What this means is that the internet viruses, worms, Trojans and who knows what else will have 'free reign' of the older machines compromising the entire net."

Ina Fried writes for CNET News.com

Comments

There are 4 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    Hi

    I have a customer where they are still using Windows 3.11 as the operating system on at least four machines on a daily basis.

    • 15 December 2003 11:52
    • Add comment
  2. 2. anonymous

    For those people with WIN9X who dont want to fund Microsoft for ever ... get a Linux desktop for about a fiver!

    • 16 December 2003 13:00
    • Add comment
  3. 3. George Travers

    I am a retired person running Windows
    98SE. This OS does everything I need
    at home here, together with Works 2000. Expenditure is a serious item
    and I am not willing to be coerced into spending money I haven't got for an OS which will not be of any advantage to me.

    • 21 December 2003 19:20
    • Add comment
  4. 4. anonymous

    I am a professional writer, who uses a PC daily, for writing and internet research.

    I simply have had no need to upgrade (and buy a new hardware platform to support the new OS).

    The idea that all machines HAVE to be replaced every three or four years, because there is a new OS which requires dramatically more processing power and RAM, is irksome.

    Keep in mind the neither Microsoft, nor any other software vendor, makes any money unless they have a continually refreshed revenue stream.

    Ergo, a continual stream of "must have" improvements.

    Imagine of we had to buy a new TV, or Stereo system or refrigerator every three to four years.

    No one would put up with it.

    I think those of us still using perfectly fine-functioning systems, ought to continue to do so.

    • 25 March 2004 10:00
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters