By Andy McCue, 6 January 2004 13:00
NEWS London's Newham Borough Council has ditched plans to move to an open source environment and will instead concentrate on negotiating a new deal with Microsoft that could act as a model for other public sector bodies.
Newham will not now take part in the Office of Government Commerce open source trials with IBM, instead focusing its energies on talks with Microsoft, after council officers decided any major migration would pose "unacceptable levels of risk" to council services.
The council had also been involved in its own small-scale Linux trials last year with the Net Project group and some of these will continue as Newham builds up its knowledge and skill base for open source.
Richard Steel, head of ICT at Newham, told silicon.com that while the council will continue to monitor open source, the time is not right for any major switch to a Linux desktop given Newham's complex IT environment.
"We got to the point where we understood the market for open source enough to make a decision. At this point in time the risks were too great," he said. "In terms of moving forward in other areas such as groupware there were significant difficulties in migrating."
Steel said it is easier for 'greenfield' IT sites to move to Linux than those with established and heterogeneous set-ups.
Newham currently has around 5,000 desktops running various operating systems and different versions of Microsoft Office but will be looking to standardise on Windows XP if negotiations with Microsoft go well.
"The goal from the start has been standardisation and that is part of the negotiations with Microsoft," said Steel. "It is interesting to see how Microsoft has reacted in the last six months. They have a much better understanding of the environment we have and the strategy and context, and that open source has a role in that."
Comments
There are 5 comments. Join the discussion
1. anonymous
I think the following quote says it all: "It is interesting to see how Microsoft has reacted in the last six months."
Now, it seems a Linux migration poses "Unacceptable levels of risk"...to whom?
2. Simon Hobson
It's easy to see why they've come to that decision, to quote : "In terms of moving forward in other areas such as groupware there were significant difficulties in migrating."
Reading between the lines, the issue is not that Open Source is 'dangerous' or 'difficult', it's that they are currently locked in to proprietry systems and it's easier to stick to what they have than to take the risk of changing to anything else (whether open or closed).
So this decision is not so much about open vs closed, it's about the risks of making ANY changes and sticking with the path of least risk - which is exactly what Microsoft have been cultivating with complex private data structures for many years.
A good demonstration of why open standards are a good idea, at least for users.
3. Nick Wright
Collaborative Intranet is a pigs-ear on Linux, and MS have a coherent approach to this with the new OSPS/WSS combination. I hope this was the really good reason that MS explained to Newham.
4. anonymous
Stupid decision
5. Jools
From early on after the announcement predictions were being made that this was just a way of knocking MS relicencing costs down.
Half the problem with the UK is that everyone's so scared of taking the rap if things go even slightly awry that any creativity or imagination has been beaten out of management.
Sad..... so very sad.