NEWS
Sun has offered IBM the benefit of its "experience" if Big Blue decides it wants to implement a wholesale move to the Linux desktop.
In a memo issued on Wednesday, Sun's software executive vice-president Jonathan Schwartz said his company is firmly committed to a wholesale move from the Microsoft desktop -- possibly in the next six months -- and is prepared to help IBM do the same.
"We're not waiting for 2005 to migrate all of Sun to a non-Microsoft desktop. By the end of this calendar year -- potentially by summer -- we'll be there," he said.
Schwartz's memo, entitled "Free advice for Sam Palmisano on IBM's desktop options", refers to a story broken earlier this year in which a leaked IBM memo appeared to show the company was committed to a wholesale internal migration to desktop Linux. But when the story became public, it was denied by IBM's public relations team.
The leaked internal memo in question, from IBM's chief information officer Bob Greenberg, revealed that Palmisano, the company's chairman, had "challenged the IT organisation, and indeed all of IBM, to move to a Linux-based desktop before the end of 2005."
But IBM later denied that it had back-tracked on the memo, with spokeswoman Trink Guarino claiming that the company was merely evaluating the idea of desktop Linux. "IBM has no plans to move all of its employees to Linux desktops by 2005" or even a majority of them, she said.
Sun's Schwartz attacked IBM for refusing to resell Linux and for its unwillingness to legally indemnify customers for its use. He said the whole affair had left him confused and disappointed by IBM's whole Linux strategy. "What's most disappointing is there appears to be no real commitment to Linux. Are you, or aren't you, moving your desktops? I guess I just don't understand your Linux strategy."
Schwartz has offered to help IBM migrate to Linux desktops by selling it Sun's Java Desktop System, released last summer. "We can offer a desktop for every one of your employees -- with a free right to use the desktop at home -- for $50 per employee. Consider this a formal quote from Sun -- but only if you're willing to buy in volume."
Sun's UK managing director, Leslie Stretch, backed up Schwartz's commitment to wholesale adoption of a non-Microsoft desktop and claimed that his team in the UK had already achieved this goal. When questioned on whether Sun UK is Microsoft-free, he said: "We are -- but not through an edict. I wouldn't bully our staff into using what we use. Three months before we hit production on [Java Desktop], most of the company was using it."
Stretch also aped Schwartz's commitment to IBM, by offering to help out IBM UK. "We can help IBM -- I'd like to go and meet them in the UK and help with their desktop. I am serious; I will be putting calls into them locally to help them. We have got the desktop running; we have proven the integration of the email environment and the browser. It's there, let's go for it."
IBM was approached for comment but was not able to respond immediately.






Comments
There are 5 comments. Join the discussion
1. A Nony Moose
Of course IBM is about 10 times the size of SUN... But I'm sure that doesn't have anything to do with it :)
2. linux boy
This is too funny - Sun offering Big Blue discount rates on desktop, they, the former 2nd place in desktop software leaders with the might Lotus Suite...
If this weren't for M$, one would bust a gut laughing ... then again....
On the other hand better this 2 *nix giants cooperate than keep on using redmondware.
3. Kyle Raglin
I downloaded linux for free...why should IBM pay Sun to use it? Even if they get hit with some "commercial use" clause, IBM is already in bed with Redhat and SuSE. Both companies offfer distributions that include Java and OpenOffice, and IBM probably already has permission to use those distributions "for free". The Java part probably doesn't even matter, since IBM has it's own Java that often compiles programs that run slightly faster, anyway.
4. Thrakos Piasecki
Isn't Sun in SCO's pocket?
How much money has Sun committed to R&D for Linux? IBM has committed $1 Billion (us).
IBM Doesn't need to indemnify their customers. They are preparing to crush SCO in such a way, that Linux will never again be bothered.
How many super bowl commercials touting linux is Sun going to have? I personally know IBM will have 3.
Yeah, that's right Sun, IBM has no real commitment to Linux. Was it $2 Million or $4 Million you gave to SCO to help them litigate their frivolous claims?
5. anonymous
What does this article actually say? It says just this: we have Sun Java Desktop. We use it ourselves and we believe in our product. IBM does not believe in Linux in such a way that they run it theirselves. Neither is IBM ready to switch. Our product can help them. While IBM claims to be THE Linux company, we're better than them. Dear customer, please consider buying from us.
Linux support == Karma.
You'll also have to consider this can result in IBM competing with SUN directly, with IBM introducing Linux distributions too. Though i can't think why, or why not.
And to the other person who said: "why pay?" With commercial Linux distributions, you pay for support just like with (most) other commercial and even propritary software.