By Andy McCue, 30 June 2004 12:55
NEWS Microsoft has dismissed high-profile European government defections to Linux, such as the city of Munich, but admitted Europe will be a key battleground in the ongoing Windows versus Linux war.
Speaking to silicon.com at the Tech Ed 2004 conference in Amsterdam this week, Microsoft's European general manager Philippe Dumont said there are cultural reasons for some governments wanting to limit dependency on US-based multinationals.
"What we have in Europe is a different situation to the US. We have a better job to do explaining and demonstrating the added value Microsoft has as a local company," he said. "We need to make sure we have less of these emotional debates around a move to Linux and open source creating independence from the US. We need to get back into more of a rational discussion about what is the cost of running Linux and open source."
Europe has seen arguably the most high-profile Linux switch, with Steve Ballmer famously flying in at the eleventh hour to try and save the deal with the Mayor of Munich. His effort failed and after a year-long trial, the city of Munich is due to begin its full open-source rollout in July.
The UK government is currently evaluating Linux in several pilot projects with IBM and Sun and the French government has also this month threatened to switch to open source as part of a cost-cutting drive.
But Dumont said the defections are limited to a few high-profile contracts. "That kind of thinking is by a few people who make a lot of noise," he said. "In reality there are very few cases."
This week, however, saw a private-sector switch when Irish bank AIB opted to ditch Microsoft for Sun's Java Desktop System. Dumont said the fact the bank was running an old version of Microsoft's software was a key factor in the switch. He called it a "one-off" and said many other banks already having opted to deploy the latest version of Microsoft Office.
Dumont also admitted that more customers are using Linux to try and get deeper discounts on Microsoft products, but said it is a "fair" negotiating tactic.
"It shows competition is alive and well," he said. "On one side we're fairly confident we've never abused our dominant position to increase prices. At the same time if customers can find a solution that is more cost-effective, they should shout about it. It's a fair game and we do the same when we go to competitor accounts."
Speaking about the European Commission's antitrust ruling over Windows Media Player, Dumont reiterated Microsoft's determination to fight the EC's call for an unbundled version of Windows.
"We would have preferred to have it behind us and that is why we worked so hard to settle and try to meet the Commission's requirements," he said. "Fragmenting the platform is not something in our mind that resolves anything."
Comments
There are 4 comments. Join the discussion
1. anonymous
Microsoft is putting a brave face on a dire situation.
Once the word gets out on the economy, security and ease of administration of Linux, Microsoft will be faced with some serious marketing problems.
The truth is Microsoft's greatest enemy, and vice versa.
2. anonymous
"Fragmenting the platform is not something in our mind that resolves anything."
Some call it fragmentation, some modularisation. Skip the big bunch of code!
3. anonymous
"Fragmenting the platform is not something in our mind that resolves anything."
How can MS claim that when they are providing cut down versions of their OS in Asia? They then claim it is not possible to remove Windows Media Player. At least they are consistently inconsistent.
4. david macleod
When people like Oracle start moving to open source, Microsoft can only look at damage limitation.
Most CIO's etc. are cheesed off having to pay twice for an operating system. Microsoft's stance on this is couldn't care less.
Longterm TCO is what most CIO's are looking at and open source does indeed seem to be the way to go.
It's actually good to have another choice.