SP2: Businesses slowly accepting Windows update

12 April deadline looms

By Ina Fried, 4 April 2005 08:10

NEWS Microsoft has urged businesses running Windows XP to upgrade their machines to take advantage of added security features but only a quarter of XP corporate machines have been upgraded to Service Pack 2, according to a new study.

In a study of 136,000 corporate PCs, Canadian asset tracking firm AssetMetrix found that more than one-third of the computers were running Windows XP but only 24 per cent had installed the security-oriented Service Pack 2 upgrade.

Companies were initially reticent to jump to SP2 when it debuted last year but the AssetMetrix study found that most companies weren't blocking SP2 entirely - they just had not upgraded in large numbers. Of the 207 companies that were using XP on at least 10 machines, about 40 per cent were blocking SP2 universally. At the other extreme, about 8 per cent had forced the SP2 on all XP-based machines as a matter of policy.

"Very few companies have drawn the line in the sand," said Steve O'Halloran, managing director of AssetMetrix Research Labs. "A good deal of the companies have a mixed environment."

Smaller companies were somewhat more likely to fully move to SP2 but in general most businesses tended to have it only on some sub-segment of their XP-based computers.

A Microsoft representative said the figures from AssetMetrix are in line with what the software maker had expected, noting that it anticipated deployment would take 12 to 18 months for many large companies.

The company said a survey it did late last year of 800 enterprise customers found that three-quarters of the businesses planned to deploy SP2 by the middle of this year. Among the companies Microsoft highlighted were Merrill Lynch, which plans to deploy SP2 across 50,000 desktops over the next several months and law firm Holland & Knight, which recently completed deployment of SP2 across all 3,500 desktops.

The report comes just as many businesses will suddenly find themselves with a lot more users of SP2. Until now, companies have been able to block computers from automatically downloading SP2 from Microsoft's server even as the machines continue to get other updates to Windows. However, as of 12 April, that option will end and all XP computers that have Windows XP's automatic update feature enabled will receive SP2.

Microsoft first announced the SP2 blocking tool last August. A month later, Microsoft extended the grace period allowing customers to block SP2 through 12 April.

AssetMetrix is recommending that companies test and deploy SP2 ahead of the 12 April deadline. In addition to the security benefits, O'Halloran noted that SP2 is likely to be the only version of XP that will be compatible with Microsoft's forthcoming Internet Explorer 7 and that support for Service Pack 1 is slated to end late next year.

But O'Halloran said that many companies either haven't established a formal policy toward SP2 or were not enforcing that position.

"We're noticing a lack of coherence between what people want to do and what people are doing."

Comments

There are 5 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Rodney Mason

    We upgraded to SP2 on WinXP and found our websirte failed. Was there support from MS - is Bill gates poor?

    We battled through and eventually after nearly losing customers we solved the problems.

    SP2 should be a option you can turn on not a mandatory feature you jhave no choice over.

    Thanks Bill - roll out Linux, Apple and give us another choice - to ditch MS. No 'fences - Mr Gates

    An unhappy MS user

  2. 2. Richard Howlett

    My company has just had the sales & accounting software (which runs on a Unix box using AcuView) upgraded and I've just had to remove SP2 from all the PC's because it was operating at snails pace. With SP2 removed it runs like a dream. This software wasn't written until after SP2 was being widely installed so we shouldn't all keep blaming Microsoft for every SP2 problem - not everything is their fault.

  3. 3. Simon Mitchell

    SP2 totally messed up my Vaio laptop and now it takes an age to boot. Its a wide problem according to forums but I can't find a fix anywhere.

  4. 4. James Liddell

    I am a very active administrator of a worldwide hobbyist group and I can't figure out if I'm a SP2 candidate or not. I presently have some 80 members in my mailing list but expect to grow to 200 or more within a few months. Mostly, we maintain non-listed 12 archival sites at 20meg each and have a bi-weekly newsletter. Should I try to get SP2, anyone? I can't figure where the dividing line between "home" and "office" comes.

  5. 5. anonymous

    SP2 is considered obnoxious by many but it IS supposed to cure many problems. Maybe 'The Real Reason' MS wants us to use SP2 is to make casual server operators switch to a server based implementation of Windows XP/2000/2003/etc since they cost more and don't have the limits on open connections? LOL who knows.

    I use SP1 because I've found that it doesn't have all the problems I've seen on SP2: nonbootable OSes, slow booting, file sharing tools breaking (because of networking handicapps), servers not working (as well/at all) because of same reason, and of course the infamous corrupt registry hive ('SOFTWARE'). Odd since Windows 2000 SP4 had some of the same bugs. Oh well...

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ