By Ina Fried, 15 April 2005 11:00
NEWS After months of keeping its prized cow in the barn, Microsoft is beginning to let Longhorn out of the corral for public viewing.
Beginning with brief demonstrations to reporters this week, the software maker is starting to shed light on just what the next version of Windows will offer when it hits the market next year.
High on the list of features are security enhancements, improved desktop searching and organizing, and better methods for laptops to roam from one network to another.
"This is going to be a big deal," Jim Allchin, Microsoft group vice president, told silicon.com's sister site CNET News.com on Thursday. While he acknowledged that Microsoft is unlikely to get throngs of people to show up outside retail stores on launch day as happened with Windows 95, he did say the company expects Longhorn to drive PC sales. "This product has something for everybody."
After staying relatively mum on what the next version of Windows will look like, Microsoft is offering a peek at how the new OS will look, work and feel.
Windows, the OS used by more than 90 per cent of the world's computers, hasn't had a full revamp in five years. Computer makers are counting on Redmond to produce an upgrade that will make people run out to nab a new PC.
In a brief demonstration, Allchin showed off several key features that make the new OS stand out from prior versions. A "quick search pane", for example, allows users to type queries and instantly see matching files.
In both look and form, the search mechanism is similar to the Spotlight feature in Apple Computer's Mac OS X Tiger, which goes on sale later this month. Search results can be saved as virtual folders that are automatically updated to include all items that fit a particular query. Documents, pictures, music and even applications can also be given a rating or keywords to add further criteria for searching.
But while the OS bears plenty of similarities to Tiger, Allchin stressed that Microsoft has broken new ground in Longhorn. For example, document icons are no longer a hint of the type of file, but rather a small picture of the file itself. The icon for a Word document, for example, is a tiny iteration of the first page of the file. Folders, too, show glimpses of what's inside. Such images can be rather small, but they offer a visual cue that aids in the searching process, Allchin said.
Allchin added that Longhorn also goes further than Tiger when it comes to what one can do with search results, saying it offers new ways to organise and view the information. While the look of the OS hasn't been finalised, the translucent windows and other graphical tricks are expected to find their way into the finished software.
As for timing, Allchin said development is basically on track for the schedule outlined by the company last autumn. An updated developer preview version will be given out at the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference, WinHEC, set to take place at the end of the month in Seattle.
The company is still shooting for an initial beta around mid-year, though it could be July, as the new official schedule is "early summer". A second beta is planned, though no final date has been given, with the goal of having the OS broadly available on PCs by next Christmas. Longhorn will come in 32-bit and 64-bit versions, Allchin said.
While many details about Longhorn have been nailed down, others, including its name, are still up in the air. The company is close to deciding which different versions will be available, but it's not ready to announce that yet. It is too soon to say, for example, whether there will be separate Media Center or Tablet PC editions, Allchin said.
"We are moving features around," he said.
Allchin said his priority is making sure Longhorn meets quality standards, followed by getting the product out on schedule. Packing it full of features is a third priority, and the one most likely to give. As a result, Microsoft would delay Longhorn over quality concerns, but is unlikely to let individual features hold up its release. That could mean some further trimming around the edges if things fall behind.
As with Windows XP Service Pack 2, security remains at the forefront of Microsoft's development efforts. With Longhorn, Microsoft isn't focusing so much on building in antivirus software as it is changing the behaviours that leave computer systems vulnerable to attack. For example, most computers today are run in administrator mode, making it easy to add new programs and make other changes, but also allowing major fundamental changes to a computer to be made by malicious software.
With Longhorn, Microsoft is trying to change that, so a computer runs with the least possible permission level. Only those programs that truly need administrator privileges would run at that level. Microsoft plans a similar change to Internet Explorer that would reduce the level of access given to external websites.
If there is more than one PC in a home network, Allchin said, it will be easy to allow sharing of files and easy to get at those files. For example, a PC with Longhorn might show all the music files together, whether they are on the local PC or another machine on the network.
There are also features designed to make it easier on businesses that use large numbers of Longhorn machines. Microsoft has created a new way for companies to put their custom installation of the OS onto a group of new machines.
Allchin said those enhancements - along with a reduction in the number of times customers have to reboot their machines and other features - will mean that companies that move to Longhorn will be able to cut their operating costs. Of course, he added, "that's up to us to prove".
Microsoft is also crafting its preliminary list of which capabilities a computer will need to run Longhorn. Allchin said the company is recommending that systems have 512MB of memory, as well as "today's level" of processor. There will be different levels of display quality depending on how much graphics horsepower a computer has.
The richest view, code-named Aero Glass, sports the fanciest bells and whistles, such as translucent windows that come to life when opened or maximized. That's where the heftiest graphics requirements come in, but Allchin said recent tests show it might not require as much horsepower as originally thought.
Ina Fried writes for CNET News.com.
Comments
There are 22 comments. Join the discussion
1. Z.G.
Wow sounds like M$ is renventing a *nix system. Mini-view os the files and folder hmmm seen that befoer not ground breaking. Not running as administrator, hmmm sounds like not running as root. This is just more BS from M$, while attempting to claim to be inovative.
2. Todd Adams
uh, Icons with the contents of the file displayed on them? Hasn't KDE and Gnome been doing this for YEARS???
How original, Microsoft.... Bravo! About the time you have prefected, We'll have "Looking Glass" and undoubtedly a bunch of spin-offs and you'll be left scratching your heads once again.
3. jahhbone
Bill Gates is truely visionary. Who would have thought he could still be making millions fixing elementary flaws that should never have been there in the first place. He reveals a problem that everyone knows exists, next OS take a minor step at repairing it which doesn't quite do the job though and opens up new issues. Simply brilliant. How many versions of windows have been "seriously addressing security issues"? The only thing bigger than his bank account is the size of his nads for continually thinking we will fall for it. And we do.
4. anonymous
Come on guys, you gotta admit, Microsoft is really breaking new grounds with this... "you can see what's inside your folders without having to open it first" stuff. Why didn't someone else think of that handy feature?
And man... not running programs unneccessarily in administrator mode? Ho lee bejeebuz on a bike... that's some *awesome* stuff right there.
5. Graham Coles
So far, all I can see are features that are about to be released in mac os X a year earlier or or are already in use in other oses.
Brilliant marketing technique that, next thing you know they'll be calling it innovative or something ...
Their 64 bit support is going to be a year late as well, since Apple have been shipping 64 bit machines (single and dual cpu) for some time while Microsoft have been struggling to get theirs sorted; still it does have the handicap of having an intel inside.
I guess Longhorn and Bulls... just naturally go together.
6. Nick Cole
What is all this really going to achieve?
Fancy searches (when the old ones used to work anyway) requiring more power to run?
Moving known functions around so we have to try and work out where they have gone? In fact probably reduction in flexibility and functionality will prevail as always.
Security enhancements..haven't we heard that before?
Stopping things run at Admin level, now there's a novelty, as if that wasn't already there.
The same old problems will stil exist, and most people have only recently got used to XP, especially the sensible ones who waited for a couple of service packs for stability.
Systems get more and more complex, more and more bloated, more and more fancy colours and icons, (who can read text in a tiny icon anyway?) how dose this aid productivity or usefulness?
And how much do we have to pay, not just in over the counter terms but in yet another learning curve of all teh bugs and foibles, only to do what we have always done before?
Given the increase in complexity and in deference to the principles of good quality control and testing shouldn't time between major releases be going up in proportion to the amount of code being generated?
What happened after XPsp" with all its security revamps and best thing since sliceed bread? Within weeks loads more patches.
When are they going to do what is really needed and that is to make sure that when components break (as they all do) that proper diagnostics are available, the element can be controlled properly and stopped/started/reinstalled as required. Documentation that is readable, and relevant, error messages that mean things, etc, etc, etc.
If only they would spend all their salary budget on fixing the existing problems instead of paying fancy graphic artists to design new colour schemes and logos.
7. Nick Cole
What is all this really going to achieve?
Fancy searches (when the old ones used to work anyway) requiring more power to run?
Moving known functions around so we have to try and work out where they have gone? In fact probably reduction in flexibility and functionality will prevail as always.
Security enhancements..haven't we heard that before?
Stopping things run at Admin level, now there's a novelty, as if that wasn't already there.
The same old problems will stil exist, and most people have only recently got used to XP, especially the sensible ones who waited for a couple of service packs for stability.
Systems get more and more complex, more and more bloated, more and more fancy colours and icons, (who can read text in a tiny icon anyway?) how dose this aid productivity or usefulness?
And how much do we have to pay, not just in over the counter terms but in yet another learning curve of all teh bugs and foibles, only to do what we have always done before?
Given the increase in complexity and in deference to the principles of good quality control and testing shouldn't time between major releases be going up in proportion to the amount of code being generated?
What happened after XPsp" with all its security revamps and best thing since sliceed bread? Within weeks loads more patches.
When are they going to do what is really needed and that is to make sure that when components break (as they all do) that proper diagnostics are available, the element can be controlled properly and stopped/started/reinstalled as required. Documentation that is readable, and relevant, error messages that mean things, etc, etc, etc.
If only they would spend all their salary budget on fixing the existing problems instead of paying fancy graphic artists to design new colour schemes and logos.
8. mark
I have used Longhorn a couple of months ago, it was an alpha version.
it looks pretty and the second task bar wha not that useful.
I ran it on a pentium 3 500 chip with 196meg of ram and a 40gb hard disk.
It ran like a dog! and it was only used as a internet browsing pc, and all the users hated it.
9. anonymous
I'll be buying Tiger, more features, a year earlier, and certainly will be more robust, why would anyone in their right mind swell the Microsoft coffers.
10. James Liddell
I'm the guy who cut his digital teeth on D-Dos and gave up six years later on trying to keep up with increasing complexity because I wanted to use a computer as a tool and not as a second vocation.
In Longhorn, if MS is turning out a "black box" with only a few admini choices (and, therefore, fewer malware possible intrusions into the "tool") then HOORAY FOR MS !! I have better things to do than worry with IPs and SQDs or LANs or other geekie bull****. I want my computer to do what I paid for it to do so I can get my job done and go have a beer with my buddies.
Put me down for One-Button Black Boxes all the way!!!
11. anonymous
So far, what I've heard about Longhorn is that it's heavy on digital right management (pandering to the movie studios and RIAA), light on features that really matter to me (improved remote and virtual networking isn't going to be in there at first release, maybe in SPXX?), and at a hefty price. Sounds like I can save my money.
12. Kevin Lee
Interesting... I can see how to create a convincing business to upgrade - NOT !
13. anonymous
<snip>
Allchin said those enhancements - along with a reduction in the number of times customers have to reboot their machines and other features - will mean that companies that move to Longhorn will be able to cut their operating costs. Of course, he added, "that's up to us to prove".
</snip>
Does this mean that you have to reboot a current windows box more than, say, once a decade?
14. BG
Whenever there is an article about Microsoft all the ?er geeks and wannebe geeks come out with their inane comments.
Windows may not be the most glamorous, innovative or best OS on the market, but for most people it is good enough. I suspect Longhorn will be on many more computers within a year of its release then Apple, Linux or any other OS. Consumers decide what the best OS is for their needs and Windows wins every time.
15. R Norman
Is it called long horn because it has taken so long to appear that the sacred cow grew her horns?
16. anonymous
I'll get interested the day Uncle Bill separates the apps from the OS and shoves the registry where it belongs!
For the uninitiated, the registry is the machine-killing hacker's paradise which does NOTHING for running applications (which is what I thought computers were for).
17. Paulus
The guy who said "consumers decide which OS to buy" that's bull... and you know it. Consumers believe what M$ tells 'em and last I saw all the PC's in PC world come with Windoze on them.
If a brand new computer user were given a proper thorough demonstration of the ease of use, security and quality difference between OS X Tiger and WIndows then they would go for OS X every time.
I know this because I support windows machines for my customers on a daily basis and my computer of choice is a Mac.
I also think Linux is cool too but not ideal for a new user.
18. Simon Bazley
Its a sad fact of life that Consumers always act as a herd and Microsoft got where it was because of that and stays there by spending vast amounts of cash on marketing to tell the consumers what they want.
*nix's security models were conservative and allowed for mistakes lower in the tree without causing serious problems. Windows security model was pants. Slowy but surely they're come over to this side of the fence as did Apple with os X. Now MS will be spending their millions of marketing dollars convinsing the consumer that what we know to be right is right. You can't critisice that.
Feel thankful for small mercies.
My next wishlist is Office for Linux and OS X for i386 or cheaper clone PPC machines. It won't happen, but it would be nice.
19. Bill Foster
"the company expects Longhorn to drive PC sales" - obviously there's a clue here that as usual you'll need a massive hardware upgrade.
20. Drew Edgar
So what are they saying... clients need triple the RAM requirement of Win 2000 or XP + the latest P4 / AMD Opteron CPU & probably a new graphics card!
To do what - database management, word processing & spreadsheet apps?
This is progress?
Is this why in this hi-tec age it takes a fortnight to get a bank statement & 4 days minimum to clear a cheque when 30 years ago you could be told with reasonable certainty the close of next day?
Will the result be "improved efficiency" i.e. staff redundancies & employing in their place cretins who can't add, multiply, divide, spell & have no understanding of English Grammar?
Res ipsa loquitur.
21. Alan Ashwood
In a previous life, all my computers were Apple. Now I have to run a M$ based network. However, the computer that controls the network - a Mac of course. Not only have I been proved right by use of Windowz PCs for the last year, but ALL my colleagues are switching to the Mac OSX, and Apple machines. Let's hope that Apple work to keep way ahead of the Windows OS as it is now, and perhaps a future MacOS 'Lynx?' will be able to run PC coded software too, without an emulator.
My household is pure Mac too! (6 of them).
22. anonymous
This is probably the best opportunity for Apple to really compete. Users know the benefits of the MacOS, but perhaps Apple isn't as good at communicating them as it should be. When Longhorn hits the streets, M$ will be blowing all the trumpets (prior to the first of a series of fixes and "security issues" etc).
Apple has probably a year of opportunity to really make it's prescence known, and take a larger market share than at present. I sell computers to the public, and selling the Mac (& OSX) is easy - and I've never heard any regrets. Microsoft were clever wwhen Apple faletered, on several ocassions in the past. They must not let this "Window" of opportunity slip again. Dyson and Apple - two excellent innovators - the rest are what they are . . the rest.