By Ina Fried, 20 April 2005 09:15
NEWS Apple Computer has reached a settlement with a second man it had accused of leaking prerelease versions of Mac OS X Tiger onto the internet.
An Apple representative confirmed on Tuesday that the company has settled with Vivek Sambhara, one of three men it sued in December for allegedly posting developer copies of Tiger onto file-sharing sites.
Last month, Apple settled with Doug Steigerwald, a recent college graduate who admitted leaking a developer copy of Tiger. Apple still has a case pending against a third man.
"Apple has settled out of court with another student who participated in the distribution of Mac OS X Tiger on a file-swapping website," an Apple representative told silicon.com's sister site, CNET News.com. "Vivek Sambhara has accepted responsibility for his actions and Apple is pleased to put another part of this case behind us."
The settlement was reported earlier on Tuesday on Drunkenblog.com, which posted court documents related to the case.
According to those documents, Sambhara would be required to return to Apple any information he received as part of his membership in the company's Apple Developer Connection and an injunction was ordered preventing him from possessing or communicating any proprietary Apple information. The complete terms of the deal were part of a settlement agreement that has not been made public.
Apple declined to say whether Sambhara paid any money to the company or otherwise comment on the terms of the agreement. A lawyer for Sambhara did not return calls seeking comment.
Ina Fried writes for CNET News.com.
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. James Liddell
OK! NOW Apple is suing where its L-A-W-Y-E-R-S can be effective, actions against the individuals who released the code.
Again, I state that the entirety of media law and precedent will deny Apple ANY success in actions against the individuals and/or entities that released the information when acting as news media.
No way, no where, no how will Applce be successful against them. Their appeals from a lower court will succeed, and perhaps even form the basis for counter-suits against Apple and its executives for abusive actions, intimidation and harrassment.