NEWS From now on, customers looking to get the latest add-ons to Windows will have to verify that their copy of the operating system is legit.
Beginning today, the piracy check will be mandatory for all customers worldwide who want to download add-ons for Windows XP.
The only exception is for security-related patches. Regardless of whether a system passes the test, security updates will be available to all Windows users via either manual download or automatic update. The Microsoft Update and Windows Update utilities, which provide notifications of new patches, will require validation.
It's all part of Windows Genuine Advantage, a stepped-up effort by Microsoft to increase the number of Windows users that are actually paying Microsoft for its software. Currently, the company estimates that roughly a third of Windows copies worldwide are not legitimate.
David Lazar, director of the Windows Genuine programme, said: "We really want to cut that rate."
With Windows' share of the desktop market estimated to be well above 90 per cent, cracking down on illegal copies of the OS is seen as one of the few ways for Microsoft to grow its Windows business. The two other main ways that Microsoft has identified are increasing the number of PCs per household and expanding computer usage in emerging markets.
Lazar declined to say how much Microsoft hopes to cut into the piracy rate with the Windows Genuine push. However, he said the company does see a need to create a clearer distinction between genuinely purchased and bogus copies of the OS.
"One of ways we are going to do that is by enhancing the value of genuine Windows," he said.
As part of that, Microsoft is adding a few more freebies to the "carrots" it gives to those whose Windows copies pass muster. Lazar said Microsoft has also refined its online tool that checks for genuine copies so customers won't have to enter their Windows product code, as was sometimes the case while the Windows Genuine programme was in testing.
Meanwhile, those who fail the validation test will be presented with two options. People who send in their CDs, show proof they bought Windows and fill out a piracy report will be eligible to get a legitimate copy of Windows at no charge. Those who don't have CDs or a proof of purchase but fill out a piracy report will have to pay for a licensed copy - $99 for Windows XP Home and $149 for Windows XP Professional. Those prices are higher than the upgrade cost for Windows XP but lower than the price one would have to pay for an entirely new copy of the OS.
Microsoft has been testing the Windows Genuine programme since last September. At first, the programme had neither benefits for those who passed inspection nor a penalty for those who failed or opted not to go through the piracy check. Gradually, though, Microsoft has been adding perks and moving to make the process mandatory.
Lazar said the company has erred on the side of caution, noting that Microsoft does not know of any cases in which its piracy check falsely concluded that software was illegitimate. There has been a hack reported in which customers who have one genuine copy of the OS can pass along a validation code which can be used with non-genuine copies of the OS. Lazar said that method would require someone to get hold of a new code each day he or she wanted to download new software, though.
"It doesn't really scale," he said.
Ina Fried writes for CNET News.com






Comments
There are 17 comments. Join the discussion
1. Duane Phillips
Its the usual story - huge greedy corporation seeks to suck more blood.
Perhaps if Micro$oft were to reduce the cost of ownership to that which people could actually afford then the piracy would stop.
If they gave the OS away for £10 a copy everybody would buy a legit version than go to some dodgy back street vendor.
2. Patrick Archibald
The usual story - company makes product, company expects customers to pay for it. Or woud Mr Philips think it fair if his employer only felt obliged to pay for his services two months out of every three?
I saw a nice pair of shoes the other day, but they were too expensive. Does that mean I would be justified in stealing them? If you think MS products are insecure or overpriced, then don't use them.
3. Richard
OK, but will stop me supporting a relative's PC:
A relative has genuine XP (of course) but only a noisy dial-up line. Some of the updates would take hours to download.
Microsoft software needs frequent patches and updates.
Normally, I download updates using my Broadband on a non-XP PC and then take them to the relative's PC.
This new Microsoft policy will mean that the relative's PC will not be kept up to date.
4. Tony
XP Pro is £259 (PCworld) in the UK and $298 (Walmart) in the US. Saving the Yanks £70+.
But then we are buying the specially tailored UK version which only needs setting from USA to UK in 7 places. I can see the need for the British people to pay extra for this faulty insecure half written software.
I have to say Microsoft are greedy and the sooner Linux is adopted the better.
5. Jon Cpu
I work in IT and this just makes it easier to push Linux, which is free anyway. I have always owned a ligit copy of xp pro but use a pirated copy because of thier stupid activation, and this is worse. May microsoft's decline be quick and humours.
6. Mike Witt
I doubt this will stop people from making illegal copies, it will just mean that those copies will remain vulnerable to any exploits.
They will be a larger and larger threat/nuisance to the internet community as the are used for DOS attacks, spam generators, or popup ad servers.
I can understand denying them phone/tech support, but I think security updates & patches should be available regardless.
7. Roger Lykens
Does not bother me one bit. I purchased the product.
8. Bob Davies
That's all well and good, but do you really want to create a culture where the poor can't keep up with technology because they can't afford the ridiculous prices involved with licensing on windows.
(not to mention it's a bag of c**p that shouldn't need updating twice a week)
I run legitimate now because I can just about afford to, but as a kid I was forced to copy DOS and early windows from friends and family or i'd have never gotten a moderately successful career in software development, there is no way a kid nowadays on paper route wages could afford to licence windows for his own PC.
Lets face it, microsoft could afford to licence home users for free. Companies should pay the price, they're the ones with 90% of all the money in the world anyway. If it makes you money it should cost you money. For education and personal use it should be free.
Make more versions, deal with features, don't sell bloat and you won't need to charge for everything. Sell specifics, lower costs, either that or subsidise linux to make it to a better standard.
9. anonymous
When you steal shoes, the shoes aren't still there afterwords. Where you can walk isn't exactly limited by what brand shoe you wear, either.
10. anonymous
Its the same old story you can go to open source but then anyone smart enough to edit open source can hack you. So you need a company to keep ahead of the Hackers then you have to buy linux or other they are still going to make you pay Lets all cut off!! Stop using your internet for one day. GEE wouldn't that be great its not a hack its revolution. Think one day without ebay sales , paypal payments bank transactions purchaces of any type!! maybe then the companies that we purchase from would provide us with free software for an operating system!!!!
This could work I am talking about millions if not billions of doollars per day running across Microsoft systems to make transactions. It should be provided by retailers since that is truely to what the intrernet has evolved.
11. NUKLENG
I'm betting that the hackers and crackers at Pantip.com will have a crack with the patches and updates on CD-Rom in a short time. They have never failed yet.
12. Chris Beach
What an idiotic suggestion. That's like pandering to terrorism by blowing ourselves up!
13. Chuck Saint
Here, Here!
I am tired of people bashing MS because they've done so well. On one hand - MS has made personal computer use as prevelant as it is (back in the DOS 1.0 days computers were not easy for the layman to use). On the other hand - pirated copies of MS OSs have made it the standard that it is today.
14. TrakerJon
There is a simple solution, download a Linux distribution for free. It's more stable than Windows, the chances of getting infected with viruses or ad and spyware are very slim if at all. OpenOffice (included in most distributions) will open Microsoft Office documents and the Evolution email client works with Microsoft Exchange servers all for the usage cost of your internet connection and some blank CD-R's. Most software for Linux is free to use, you can pay for support if you really need it (the way things used to be until Microsoft took over the computing world by stealing and then selling others ideas and inovations).
15. dave beall
I have 3 legit machines runnig at home and none of them have ever had the first patch applied. If the product is so dam great, them it should not need anything. I never have had a problem.
I am working with linux to figure which one i will use for the long run.....
it is so much better than windows. Much faster and very stable so far.
The world needs to get off the adiction to the microsoft windows drug.
The world will be a better place without the greed and the total insecurity of the microsoft.
16. Chris Withall
MS gives it BIG customers MAJOR discouting like less than $30 per copy of XP pro -and that tax deductable.
£145 per PC for the same thing for home (asuming you dont want the network butcher version they call "home") use on a DSL home wi-fi network, is proposterious. the average swiched on home with 2 kids has 1 each for the kids and 1 grownup's computer.
So will it stop millions of home users from hookie street ? You can bet not !
MS should look at its O/S's real use and licence its software accordingly.
17. M. Marvinski
The problem with MS$ is that they don't take responsibility for the security of their own product. They sell you a product at a premium price, then you have to buy and/or download more software to make it secure and usable. That is the epitome of irresponsibility. If Linux does the same thing, it would be guilty of the same thing.