Salesforce confronts outages critics

"It is a fact that our profile is such that if something happens then it is news"

By Colin Barker, 6 March 2006 09:30

NEWS

Salesforce.com has responded to some of the criticism it has suffered after service outages left customers without their CRM services for as long as an hour and a half.

These problems hit the headlines just before last Christmas when Salesforce faced its biggest outage to date. Since then, the service has suffered intermittent faults, prompting the company to launch its own service to track outages.

The service, Trust.salesforce.com, launched late last month, tracks the system performance of Salesforce's four main servers - two in the US, one covering Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and one covering the Asia-Pacific region. At the end of each day it publishes a performance summary, with a traffic-light colour-coding system using green, amber and red to indicate good service, minor problems and outages, respectively.

Phill Robinson, chief marketing officer for Salesforce, said this week: "When we had a problem at Christmas, the biggest thing that people said to us was, 'Why didn't you tell us?'.

"Well, we do what the customer wants, and now our customers can see how the site is doing and they can also see the state of each individual server."

At the time of writing, the service showed that two significant outages had occurred on one service in the US - one between 10:54 and 12:15(PST) on 9 February and one between 18:28 and 19:30(PST) on 16 February.

The first was the most disruptive, and happened when "a primary hardware server in our cluster failed and one of our North American (NA1) servers did not automatically recover. This required a manual restart of the NA1 database, which completed at 12:15 P[S]T," according to the website.

Robinson insists the launch of the site was not a "knee-jerk" reaction to Salesforce's recent problems.

He said: "It is a fact that our profile is such that if something happens then it is news. It's news just because it has happened to us. We don't mind that. What I would like to ask is do our competitors do that? I am not sure they are. The fact is that systems do have problems and outages from time to time."

Customers in the UK and the rest of Europe escaped last December's outage, according to Salesforce but it riled a voluble section of the US user base, which became angry that a system they had grown to trust had let them down.

Salesforce claims an availability rate of between 99 per cent and 100 per cent. Yet some of the customers that complained about the December outage also said that smaller, less-disruptive outages occurred more frequently than they anticipated.

Salesforce is trying to address this issue as well with the traffic-light system within Trust.salesforce.com, whose performance indicator will go "yellow for issues that last longer than 10 minutes, and red for disruptions that last longer than 30 minutes".

The system also identifies "incidents of less than 10 minutes" - of which there were eight during February.

Colin Barker writes for ZDNet UK

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Michael Rosenberg, MD, MPH

    We subscribed and found that the sales rhetoric far outstripped service. They seem dedicated to timeliness (eg, they return calls quickly), but they do not deal meaningfully with issues such as outages. We had a very severe issue with this, and with some other things--and the message, politely delivered, was "too bad, you already paid, we're not going to do anything."
    Messages to the CEO, who we had some contact with before the sale and assured us he was always there to help, went unanswered

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ