By Joris Evers, 8 May 2006 08:20
NEWS
New security features in Windows Vista will largely eliminate the need to run separate anti-spyware or firewall software, according to a new analyst report.
The next major release of Microsoft's flagship operating system, which is due out early next year, promises not only to increase security for consumers, it will also dramatically affect the $3.6bn market for Windows security products, according to a Yankee Group report scheduled to be published today.
Analyst Andrew Jaquith wrote in the report: "Yankee Group expects Vista to significantly shrink the aftermarket for anti-spyware and desktop firewalls."
Additionally, Microsoft's first new operating system release in five years may reduce the need for disk encryption, device control and certain types of host intrusion prevention software, Jaquith wrote.
But Vista won't have any effect on the antivirus software space, which at $2.6bn is the largest market for Windows desktop security software, according to Yankee Group. Vista does not include antivirus functionality; Microsoft plans to sell its Windows Live OneCare antivirus software separately starting next month.
The impact on the aftermarket depends on Vista's features. Windows Defender, Vista's spyware protection, as well as the improved Windows Firewall are fine for the majority of users, Jaquith believes. However, the BitLocker disk encryption feature and tools to manage devices such as USB keys will work only for some, he said in an interview.
Small organisations may find Microsoft's disk encryption and device management good enough out of the box but large enterprises will need more management features, leaving room for third parties, he said: "Companies that can focus on manageability and scalability, even if those products overlap with Vista, will continue to do well."
Faced with many delays, Microsoft scrapped many of its ambitious plans for Vista, previously known by its Longhorn codename. However, the security enhancements have stayed largely intact. Yankee Group believes the number of critical security vulnerabilities that will hit users will be reduced by as much as 80 per cent and the impact of the remaining fraction significantly reduced.
But while the changes in Vista should reduce the risk for most users, the security features mean upgrading won't be easy, Jaquith cautioned. "Vista will dramatically improve the security for Windows users but they have some execution and usability challenges," he said. "It is clear as day that Vista is going to really annoy users."
The annoyance would come from such features as User Account Control, which is to be enabled by default and lets users run Windows with fewer privileges. The intent is to thwart malicious software from gaining a foothold on Windows PCs. Jaquith wrote: "Although the new security system shows promise, it is far too chatty and annoying."
As a result, Yankee Group recommends business users who don't want to be on the bleeding edge to steer clear of Vista until 2008 and continue to use Windows XP with Service Pack 2 until then. Jaquith wrote: "As a hedging strategy, enterprises upgrading their hardware should also take a look Apple's dual boot Intel Macintoshes."
Joris Evers writes for CNET News.com
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. Simon
Not mentioned is the biggest reason of all not to upgrade !
At present, after something like 6 years of having what should be a good security model, there are still packages out there that will NOT run unless the user has admin rights. There are still packages that can't cope with a space in the path name. There are still packages that can't cope with the concept of a network.
Some of these are not obscure old packages from some 'mom&pop' outfit in the back of beyond - some of these problems I've seen in what should be 'professional' software from big names.
Come the day when Microsoft themselves run all their users as 'regular users' (even, or especially, when running MS apps) then I'll believe that their security model is approaching usability. Until then, it's something that looks nice, but disappoints when you get the glitzy wrapper off.
Oh yes, and just for good measure - useable means "will work with any file server", instead of screwing the user when connecting to third party servers.