By Sylvia Carr, 24 May 2006 16:40
NEWS
Mozilla, maker of the open source Firefox web browser and Thunderbird email client, says a reliance on proprietary technologies is still an obstacle for IT directors looking to deploy open source in the enterprise.
Mozilla Corporation CEO Mitchell Baker readily admitted to silicon.com that the enterprise is "not our sweet spot" but said the organisation offers an enterprise customisation kit created by an IBM developer and said it's interested in working with partners to address the needs of corporate IT.
Baker said: "The gold is the company that steps up and says 'I'm willing to do something'."
Currently Mozilla believes more users fire up Firefox at home than at work, as usage numbers jump at the weekend.
While many IT directors do allow the open source browser to be used on company time, those that don't are often held back by the proprietary technologies employed on their intranets.
Baker said: "Enterprises have intranets that only work with IE. We can't fix their intranet."
Another hurdle Firefox must overcome is the "heartbreakingly slow" process many enterprises go through to certify the use of a tool as critical as a web browser, according to Baker.
It's this need to comply with proprietary technology - as well as general quality issues - that, Baker claims, holds IT departments back from going with client-side open source applications, not merely the fact they're open source.
On the server side, though, she said: "I hear open source is in the enterprise - sometimes it's open and acknowledged, sometimes it's not."
The next version of Mozilla's web browser, Firefox 2.0, is due out in the third quarter of this year. New features will aim to make "using information quicker, easier and better", said Baker. The new Firefox will sport improved tabs and search boxes, better use of RSS, and anti-phishing and other security enhancements.
Baker said Mozilla's 2005 revenue was in the "tens of millions of dollars" range - and that the organisation is now investigating ways to give some of that back to the volunteer development community.
She said: "Some of that revenue should find its way into the community in some form."
This compensation is more likely to take the form of hardware gifts or other resources, not fat pay-cheques, though.
She said: "We could never pay enough people to make Firefox," especially at the level they'd make at rivals such as Microsoft. "We won't be doing that."
Baker explained Mozilla is in the process of hiring an individual to spend six months figuring out how to give some of its profits back to the community.
Comments
There are 3 comments. Join the discussion
1. Charles Smith
Firefox is not in the budget! Having worked in large global enterprises I'd say there are two primary reasons for low adoption of Firefox. IT Management Inertia is one reason, such as why should we change IE is working ok. The second reason is blinkered software developers only developing software within a Microsoft environment and developing solutions that use proprietory features of IE.
A pity really, because I use both Firefox and IE in my office. I know that I feel a lot more secure when using Firefox on a new website. It also seems to give more consistent results in display.
2. Nick Cole
I'm not really surprised. Part of the difficulty is that while there are some new features in Firefox they don't fall into the category of essential or must have. Similarly the issues of security appeal mostly to the naive. All software has faults. Even if they aren't the fault of the high level programmers there are issues down at the compiler level as well. Firefox security reputation stems largely from the fact that it is new not that widespread and there isn't an army of people out there trying to destroy, and of course that it isn't Microsoft.
There are sufficient differences on the way screens are presented on Firefox to render the costs of migrating from IE to any other browser. With the duplication of support and intranet code maintenance, and the added complication of distribution of a non-embedded piece of software too much to bear in comparison with the lack of cpst justified demand for the new features.
3. martyn
I'm not surprised at this.
A lot of the IT dept use it but overall it is more trouble than IE.
We are prepared to work around the issues because of the advantages in some areas but we are not going to try to support hundreds of users to do this when IE is relatively trouble free for the uses to which it is commonly put.