Think twice about Office upgrades - Gartner

The price tag is hard to justify...

By Andrew Donoghue, 23 June 2006 08:20

NEWS

Only companies signed up to Microsoft's Software Assurance scheme are likely to adopt Office 2007 in the near future because IT managers find it extremely hard to justify an Office upgrade to their board, according to analyst group Gartner.

Speaking at the Midsize Enterprise Summit in Paris on Wednesday, Gartner principal research analyst Annette Jump said research done by the group showed only about two per cent of companies who aren't signed up to Microsoft's Software Assurance (SA) scheme had adopted the previous version of the productivity suite - Office 2003.

The SA scheme ties companies into automatic upgrades of new Microsoft software but at a discounted rate. The scheme was updated late last year after coming under fire for allegedly locking users into buying needless Windows upgrades.

Jump said: "Very few companies will be able to justify buying Office at full price which shows the importance of SA to Microsoft. Only two per cent of companies surveyed last year who were using Office 2003 weren't on SA."

Companies should look to quantify carefully what benefits moving to the next version of Office will have for their users as - unlike the move to Windows Vista which the analyst claims can be staggered - supporting two or more versions of Office is prohibitively costly. Jump said: "We believe that many companies will have to do a forklift migration with Office 2007 as supporting two versions of Office is very complex and will be too complicated for most."

Office 2007 will include several new features, including an all-new user interface and new XML-based file formats.

Microsoft will offer new editions for the workplace. In the Professional Plus version, Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook are augmented with the Access and Publisher products that come with the Professional edition, the Office Communicator instant messaging program, InfoPath form-creation software, and server-based content management and forms management capabilities.

There will also be an Enterprise version, which adds Groove, the collaboration program - developed by Ray Ozzie - which Microsoft acquired last year. Users who get the Groove desktop software have the choice of running their own Groove server or subscribing to a hosted service.

Jump added that few companies will be in a rush to deploy Office 2007 immediately as many have only just deployed Office 2003. Although Office 2007 will run on Windows XP, most companies will probably look to have Vista installed before migrating to it. "Office 2007 will only catch 10 per cent of Microsoft's installed base by the middle of 2008 as only a small percentage will have moved to Vista by that point," added Jump.

And despite Redmond's claims that Office 2007 will have improved graphical interfaces, the costs of supporting the suite through a helpdesk will actually increase in the short term as users get to grips with new features, according to Gartner.

Jump explained: "They are trying to make it much more user-exposed and the menu will change depending on what activity you do. In the first few months, the cost of helpdesk support will go up despite the fact that Microsoft says the graphical interface will help drive down calls."

Companies that have a conservative approach to technology and aren't planning to integrate Office 2007 into their core business process may even choose to skip the release all together or deploy it much later, said Jump.

However she added that all companies will be required to deploy converters to ensure that their users are able to interact with early adopters of Office 2007. "All of you will have to deploy converters later this year or early 2007," she told her audience of IT professionals.

Andrew Donoghue writes for ZDNet UK

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Nick Cole

    It is pretty obvious that the vast majority of users are not in the slightest bit interested in all the new features.

    Software Advantage is merely a way for Microsoft's software writers to justify (and get paid for) continuing to produce things that they want and the world doesn't.

    Why does the world have to install converters when only a tiny percentage of people are actually going to need the converted file?

    Microsoft should start producing things that people want. They can start this off by producing an add-in module for their current 97/2000/2003 file save options so that the result file is an option in the existing fit-for-the-vast-majority of purposes.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ