Vista to get transfer limits to combat piracy

Restrictions on physical and virtual machines...

By Ina Fried, 17 October 2006 08:35

NEWS

Windows Vista may have new features for mobile computers but the operating system itself is becoming considerably less portable.

Under changes to Microsoft's licensing terms, buyers of retail copies of Vista will only be able to transfer their software to a new machine once. If they want to move their software a second time, they will have to buy a new copy of the operating system.

In the past, those who bought a retail copy of Windows needed to uninstall it from any machine before moving it to another machine but there was no limit to how many times this could be done.

Shanen Boettcher, a general manager in Microsoft's Windows Vista unit, said: "It was something that had been abused from a piracy perspective before. We're just being clear it's one move from machine to machine that you are licensed for."

The software company will use its anti-piracy programmes, including its recently announced Software Protection Platform, to enforce the new changes, Boettcher said.

Separate rules apply for the versions of Windows installed on new PCs, which is how most people get their copy of the software, Boettcher said. In most cases, copies of Windows purchased on a new PC cannot legally be transferred.

The licence changes also apply to virtualisation, in which a computer runs multiple operating systems, or multiple copies of the same operating system, at the same time. Customers can only transfer the copy of Windows once, including a transfer from one physical machine to a virtual machine, or from a virtual machine on one PC to a virtual machine on another PC.

Boettcher said: "Virtualisation is a new technology. We are going to learn more about the use cases as we move forward."

People who have specific questions can call customer support, he said.

Microsoft is also making some other changes as far as virtualisation goes. Although any Windows version can serve as the primary, or host, operating system, only the Business and Ultimate versions of Vista can run as guest operating systems in virtualisation. In Windows XP, each virtual instance of the OS required a separate licence but there were no restrictions on which versions could act as guests.

Large businesses that obtain Windows Vista Enterprise edition through a volume-licensing contract can run up to four instances of Vista on the same machine with a single licence. Developers in Microsoft's MSDN programme can also use more copies of the operating system for testing purposes, Boettcher said.

The change is significant for technology enthusiasts, as well as for Mac users running software such as Parallels Workstation that allows Windows to run at the same time as the Mac OS.

The rule change would not have an impact on Apple's Boot Camp software, which installs Windows in a separate partition and allows users to run the Mac OS and Windows but not at the same time.

Also as part of the changes, Microsoft extended the warranty for Windows. Buyers of retail copies of Vista will get a one-year warranty, which is typical of most Microsoft software, as opposed to the 90-day warranty that comes with XP.

Boettcher said Microsoft has heard some concerns regarding virtual machine issues but doesn't think the licence changes represent a threat to Vista sales. "It hasn't come up as any kind of a blocker for adoption," he said.

Ina Fried writes for CNET News.com

Comments

There are 9 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    This is getting ridiculous. I was thinking of buying a dual core with Vista in Spring '07, but why bother? I might just take the plunge and go with Mac OSX.

  2. 2. Charles Smith

    Strike Vista off the list of future purchases. We build our own PC's from base components and we upgrade the olderones with new motherboard etc. One of the boring bits is re-registering the XP for the same machines.

    Under Vista it looks as though every simple upgrade could lead to having to buy another copy of the operating system.

    This is a good argument for using a LINUX desktop and whilst we are at it Open Office which works just fine.

    The proposed licencing of Vista is a cynical clawback by Microsoft. If they were really worried they could easily produce a smart/RFID card and reader for a few dollars and finally sort out their licensing farago. The smart card could then be used to hold a variety of licences in an encrypted fomat.

  3. 3. anonymous

    Good idea, my copy of windows 2000 have been install on 4 generation of computer. I don't think i will buy Vista. May be Linux is a good idea after all.

  4. 4. anonymous

    I wonder what MS will consider a "new" PC? New hard drive ? New Motherboard? New Modem? Addition of a RAID controller? Memory upgrade? I have had all of these require me to re activate XP. At this rate you will be scared to switch on the PC in case it goes wrong (you certainly won't want to install any MS updates - the main cause of PC failure).

  5. 5. Sam Kouri

    It seems like a self-destruction for Microsoft. It is a very strange idea not to be able to install Vista more than one time. I would say it is better for Microsoft to add extra charge to Vista orignal price for multi-installation version ($50 for 5 downloads).
    Otherwise, they may stop piracy and gain more money, but they will lose more customers also.

    Wish Miscrosoft change its policy, otherwise they will lose ground to Apple and Linux.

  6. 6. Peter Horne

    I also build my own computers from motherboards etc. and its bad enough with the current XP situation where you have to phone Microsoft once you have reloaded more than a couple of tiles. This will make it impossible. Im not sure whether its actually legal for Microsoft to do this as theyt are artificially restricting one's ability to use an item that you have legally bought !!!.

  7. 7. D Fletcher

    I wonder how vocal $soft will be on this "feature" in their "Get the Facts" campaigns?

    Further, I wonder if it is actually legal? Ryanair's terms and conditions have fallen foul of European law. So could $soft's licence if it's not compliant.

    But all this really doesn't affect me, because I'm not going to be buying Vista anyway. The one and only XP application I need to run on my home PC is the Nokia PC suite.

    Fedora Core Linux does absolutely everything else I need to do at home, and the open source developers are gradually getting the mobile phone software together too. kmobiletools already lets me see the numbers on the phone and send SMS using the computer. See
    http://fedora.redhat.com/

    Kubuntu is looking pretty good too. I've recently given away several installation CDs for this completely free operating system recently. See
    http://www.kubuntu.org/

    So far as work is concerned, I've just started reading the wxWidgets book from Amazon, so when I start getting involved in GUI programming I will be completely free from any ties to any particular operating system.

    Once people in general start to realise its benefits, and Open Source reaches critical mass, be afraid, Bill, be Very Afraid.

  8. 8. Stewart

    I too will be making the move to Linux as a result of this. A step too far by Microsoft. I wonder if they will get away with this, as to me it sounds like it's bending the law.

  9. 9. Rob Garner

    Why worry - Vista dosent run on current computers anyway. Tried RC1 on a dual core 1.6Ghz with 1Gb RAM and 160Gb HD and got told by the system that this was way too small to run Vista properly. It will be end of 2007 when the machines to run this will be around - about the same time as Vista eventually gets released.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ