Office 2007 a slow burner for businesses

Majority plan to wait three to five years, says Forrester

NEWS

Three-quarters of businesses plan to wait at least three years before upgrading to the newly launched Microsoft Office 2007, according to new research from Forrester.

The report, Office Productivity Software Trends: 2007 And Beyond, questioned 118 companies in Europe and the US about their future office software plans.

Of those using Microsoft Office just over half (52 per cent) are still on Office 2003, with many enterprises only having completed that upgrade in the last 18 months and 74 per cent saying they plan to wait three to five years before moving to Office 2007.

That supports the verdict of silicon.com's CIO Jury last year, which found most businesses plan to wait at least two years before upgrading to Office 2007.

Just over a quarter of businesses (26 per cent) say they would consider alternatives to Microsoft such as Google and Openoffice.org because of concerns with licensing costs and the new look and feel of Office 2007. Survey respondents indicated Office 2007 could be too difficult for employees to learn and that it could have a negative impact on productivity.

For future innovation almost all the survey respondents expect Microsoft to be the leader, closely followed by Google ahead of more traditional enterprise vendors such as Adobe, IBM and Sun.

The Forrester report said: "Google's approach to office productivity not only has the attention of enterprises, it's also a real, long-term threat to Microsoft's office productivity dominance. Google's model focuses on influencing consumer expectations and the firm hopes that consumers will influence enterprise IT buyer behaviour."

The current debate over Opendocument file format standards is also of little concern to CIOs when making decisions on office productivity suites, with one respondent from a financial services company saying: "The news is entertaining but we're not changing direction just for a file format."

Comments

There are 2 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    So long as the version that you use does all that is required of it what is the need to upgrade to a later version.

    Most people (if not all) don't use all the features that their current version has anyway therefore there is not any need for anyone to upgrade (other than to waste money).

    • 25 January 2007 12:19
    • Add comment
  2. 2. Simon

    Of course, what all these reports casually overlook is Microsofts plan to force you to upgrade !

    Put simply, if you don't upgrade then you will find it increasingly difficult to deal with files sent to you - because once again Microsoft has changed the file format to make sure that you can't open new documents with old software.

    Of course, poeple can, and will, change their default save format to ensure backwards compatibility - but some will forget and other will switch back when they've done their own upgrades. Some will switch when they get fed up with the nagware that (from past experience) I expect people will get telling them that they really should be saving this document in the new format or they'll lose some content.

    • 26 January 2007 12:42
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters