NEWS
Six months after the launch of Windows Vista businesses remain cautious about Microsoft's latest operating system.
Although Microsoft has painted a rosy picture of adoption of its new operating system, analysts say the decision to upgrade hasn't been quick or simple for enterprises.
Vista is a much bigger change for businesses than XP, which was essentially a Windows 2000 update, said Ovum analyst David Bradshaw. As a result companies will upgrade to it depending on their needs and whether it is supported by their existing hardware.
Got two seconds?
Make your voice heard - take our latest poll.
Bradshaw said: "They [big firms] have to resolve all these kind of issues. The bigger the organisation, the bigger the problems they'll have."
As result, he said: "At the moment there's relatively little uptake among business users."
Annette Jump, research director at Gartner said uptake for large businesses could be as low as one per cent, mainly consisting of organisations testing the operating system or those which are part of the early adoption programme.
"There is very limited uptake in the larger companies," she said.
Bigger companies will probably wait until mid-2008 to make the switch to Vista, to ensure all of their applications are fully supported, she said.
She said: "There are lots of issues in terms of the drivers needed. It is not something that will be resolved very quickly."
There is even evidence that some businesses are buying PCs installed with Vista then downgrading to XP to put off making a full upgrade, she added.
When it comes to smaller companies, Jump said it might be a different story "because small businesses behave more like consumers".
But she said uptake could be driven by a lack of choice compared to when XP came out. When XP was launched in 2001, Windows 2000 and Windows 98 still came pre-installed on PCs.
That some businesses have been waiting for Vista for a long time - with some staying with Windows 2000 - could also drive uptake, she said.
And adoption is likely to increase in the second half of the year, according to Ovum's Bradshaw. "I think we're likely to see more uptake in the second part of the year. I think it'll go faster than XP went," he said.
Microsoft is pleased with uptake so far.
David Weeks, Windows client marketing manager, told silicon.com: "It's going extremely well. It's proving to be the fastest uptake of an operating system ever."
Weeks quoted Gartner figures predicting 4.6 per cent of Windows business customers will have switched to Vista in the first year of its availability.
This compares with 2.6 per cent for Windows 2000 in its first 12 months on the market.
But Weeks acknowledged there are issues affecting the speed of uptake for businesses. "Whenever we launch a new operating system, device drivers are the biggest issue," he said.
Weeks pointed out that 98 per cent of devices are now supported by Vista - via some 30,000 drivers.
The analysts admit the uptake for consumer versions of Vista - launched on 31 January - has been faster due to the less complex issues.
Ian Fogg, analyst at Jupiter, said: "Despite a lot of hype surrounding Vista's teething problems, the reality is Windows Vista is the standard consumer operating system."
But, he said: "Windows XP, isn't going to go away any time soon. It's really very early days on the consumer side."
According to Gartner figures, 55 per cent of new consumer computers sold in 2007 will have Vista pre-installed. This compares to 41 per cent with XP, three per cent with Apple's OS and one per cent with Linux.
But by the end of the second quarter, Gartner's Jump predicts the percentage of PCs with Vista pre-installed will have rocketed to 96 per cent.






Comments
There are 5 comments. Join the discussion
1. Anthony Hunt
I spoke to a friend yesterday who had bought a new laptop last week, pre-installed with Vista. After four days of being unable to run or even load the business crtitcal software he needed (downloading tachographs), he bought a copy of Windows XP online and re-installed the laptop.
Now it runs noticeably faster and all his software works.
I haev only spoken to one person who has not experience trouble with Vista. And she is a teacher who only uses Office/Word.
Microsoft need to take immediate action in the form of a service pack.
Memory optimisation - 2GB is absurd.
Speed optimisation - It's not Aero, so where's all the CPU going?
Driver support - virtualisation / compatibility layer (whatever makes XP drivers work)
Contrary to what Micrososft seems to think, if the meal stinks, the customer WILL send the plate back to the kitchen.
2. david patterson
What rubbish,
I patched my Sony Vaio for Vista
and the hot keys, external monitor
switching and internal camera don;t
work still. I can't use my Cisco VPN
client to dial in from home.
Advise to business users: Don't bother
unless your PC is built for Vista and
even then consider replacing it with XP
as you'll have a headache from your
users.
3. Gary Parratt
Not surprising when not given the choice of loaded software - still advise to choose XP given a choice.
have had to unload Vista too many times. So all these figures are misleading - Vista is out there not because of choice!
Note that Dell stopped selling XP on their PCs but had to bow to pressure and give the option. So get those analysts actually working out something rather than taking figures as set!
4. Hugh Bracey
I, and my clients, are not prepared to upgrade to VISTA, or buy new computers with Vista installed, until they can be sure that all their existing software will still work properly and efficiently.
Having to purchase upgrades for all software is in many cases, far more expensive, than buying the new computer!!
5. Peter
As a director of a small company, I think that the article is wrong when it says that "we" are more likely than corporates to switch to Vista. Has anyone worked out why they should bother? Everything that I have seen says that Vista is just a slightly different interface but no real new functionality. If that is the case, then frankly I can't be bothered especially if there is even the slightest chance of hassle. I think most small companies have too little time and don't have IT departments to solve problems for them... So when the corporates begin to switch in numbers, it's time for small companies to think about following suit!!