Vista: Can Service Pack 1 spur adoption?

Microsoft certainly hopes so...

NEWS

The first Vista service pack may serve dual purposes for Microsoft: fixing the operating system's rough edges while simultaneously indicating that it's ready for mass adoption.

Microsoft initially downplayed the importance of service packs in an era where patches are easily available online. Also, the company urged businesses not to wait for a service pack to start testing and rolling out Vista.

Nonetheless, in announcing its plans to release Service Pack 1 early next year, Microsoft is noting that the milestone remains an important signal for some businesses that the OS has reached a level of maturity.

Many analysts have consistently advised companies to hold off on Vista deployments until the first service pack's arrival.

Shanen Boettcher, a general manager in the Windows unit, said: "There's always a portion of the market that has that MO [modus operandi]."

By talking about SP1, Microsoft hopes to sway some businesses that have yet to move forward in any fashion to start at least testing the OS.

Boettcher said: "I would expect that we will see a little bit of an increase."

Microsoft has said it expects businesses to move to Vista at twice the rate that they did with XP over its first 12 months. However, Al Gillen, an analyst at IDC, said businesses seem to be moving at generally the same pace as with previous releases. "From what we can see, the adoption curve is running much like past releases," he said.

In part, that's because so much goes into upgrading the OS, Gillen said. Companies have to test it against their custom and packaged software, do security reviews, make sure they have enough machines capable of running the new operating system, and then budget for the hardware, software training and support costs.

Gillen added: "Customers drag their feet."

While most businesses have yet to start deploying Vista in significant numbers, Microsoft is touting a few large companies that have started putting the operating system onto a sizable number of desktops. Infosys, for example, has 4,000 PCs running Vista now, with plans for 20,000 by the year's end. Citigroup, Charter Communications and Continental Airlines all have more than 2,000 machines on Vista and plan to have 10,000 machines running the operating system by the year's end.

But, said Gillen, these early adopters "are really the exception and not the norm".

Boettcher said the adoption rate so far among businesses "is about how we expected it to be".

As for the company's goal of doubling adoption, he said: "It's still early to declare victory... All the signs are we are doing well versus our goal."

Gillen said the timing of the service pack probably hasn't made a huge impact on when businesses move to Vista. "If they had brought SP1 out in the first three to six months after the release, I don't think that would have dramatically changed the adoption," he said.

What's unclear is whether Service Pack 1 will help to dispel the notion that the operating system still has too many glitches and hitches to justify the effort of migration. Even some who were initially bullish on the OS, have lately criticised its trouble spots.

Microsoft says it now has better driver support and compatibility with existing software than it did at Vista's launch, which could help businesses justify making the move.

The company openly admits that the stars didn't align for a big-bang Vista launch - reminiscent of Windows 95's debut - that it clearly hoped for. Corporate vice president Mike Sievert said in an interview at Microsoft's recent partner conference in Denver: "Frankly, the world wasn't 100 per cent ready for Windows Vista. That has changed in a very material way in the past six months."

Gillen said it is good to see Microsoft also commit to a timetable for Windows XP Service Pack 3, which is due out in the first half of next year. "It's a nice indication that they are not trying to subtly coerce customers to move forward onto Windows Vista."

Ina Fried writes for CNET News.com

Comments

There are 4 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Jay C

    People [users, at least in stoke] don't care what OS they have and 'dont know' in my experience, if they can do there work with 1 or 2 apps their happy

    • 4 September 2007 13:01
    • Add comment
  2. 2. Nick Cole

    Why? What is the point of spending more money on a newly tarted up visual experience, to go through another learning curve, to buy a much more powerful machine, with the same old bugs and issues remaining unfixed, merely to do exactly what we were all doing quite happily before?

    • 4 September 2007 17:02
    • Add comment
  3. 3. Karen Challinor

    the basic function of an OS is to efficiently put the resources of the machine at your disposal with as little overhead cost as possible, now ok for a GUI OS the overhead is rather high but the basic premise still stands

    Vista seems to built with no thought to this whatsoever, everything is "hidden", everything is "protected", the user is assumed to be a) a numpty and b) a thief and the OS has been designed with these concepts paramount, "control the machine" is way down the list "control the user" is right at the top

    pop ups that ask "are you sure ?" and "is this really you doing this ?" are a step back to that damned annoying paperclip assistant thing in office

    we are not children if we are installing software then thats us doing it, put the warnings somewhere useful like when they are triggered by some code on a webpage from a mouse rollover event rather than a click not from when I run an install program from a CD

    building DRM in from the ground up is just kowtowing to the RIAA and is more of a hindrance to the end user who just wants a backup of their expensive premium content than it is an effective deterrent for the pirate who has the money and resources to rip it off and mass produce it as if the DRM weren't there anyway

    when the dark day dawns that my current PC dies and has to be replaced I'm getting a barebones machine and sticking some flavour of Unix on it, this Vista debacle has just spoiled it for me and Microsoft

    • 5 September 2007 12:23
    • Add comment
  4. 4. anonymous

    What is the point? It won't change anything.

    I thought I would investigate Vista and ran the Vista Adviser on my laptop and was congratulated that it would indeed work.

    Then the report said that there were three critical pieces of software which would never work with it and seventeen other pieces which would need tweaking with drivers etc and it was MY responsibility to sort it, so I could use THEIR software.

    Sorry, Bill, you're having a laugh! I don't have the time - in any case, why change something which does not need fixing?

    Can you come back in a few years time?

    • 7 September 2007 13:10
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters