By Seb Janacek, 5 November 2007 15:51
COMMENT
Last month's Leopard launch should have been a triumph. Instead, the OS' 'blue screen of death' has left Apple with damage to its image and credibility, argues Seb Janacek.
For Mac users, it was to be a time of celebration and for many it was - but not for all. For true Mac geeks - the ones who live not for the upgrades to the shiny metal exteriors but for the upgrades to the shiny goodness in the operating system - a new iteration of the big cat OS X is like Christmas come early.
With OS X Leopard, an upgrade which has been a long time coming for Mac users, expectation and excitement was high. And so were initial sales of the software - Apple claims it shifted two million copies in its opening weekend.
Those are the kinds of sales you can liken to historic opening weekends of record-breaking movie blockbusters.
However, reports soon began to flood in claiming there were serious problems with the upgrade path. Users found despite an apparently successful installation, their Macs soon hung on restarting and presented users with a blank blue monitor. The Mac had its very own blue screen of death (BSOD).
For an operating system that had mocked Windows PCs by representing them as monitors displaying the BSOD in its networking set-up, this was an unpleasant irony. Although some might say this was no more than Apple's recent hubris deserved.
Apple's support lines and site were swamped. Fixes to the problem soon appeared on the website and, with the exception of the incredibly silly people who decided to upgrade their system software without backing up their files first, there was no permanent damage.
The root of some problems with Leopard's blue screen apparently lay with application enhancement programs developed by Unsanity. The company, which has admitted its software may be causing some problems with Leopard upgrades due to compatibility issues, produces 'haxies'.
The word 'haxies' is a combination of 'hack' and 'OS X', a clue that the software touches areas of the Mac system software that really shouldn't be touched.
Apple's support note said it all: "You may have third-party 'enhancement' software installed that does not work with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard". You've got to love those quotation marks.
Overall, the problems will have affected a very small proportion of Leopard upgraders. But it's been a damaging episode for Apple's image and for its credibility.
While Apple doesn't need to support third-party apps, particularly ones that mess with system libraries, it's unfortunate - given the prevalence of the haxies in Macs - Apple didn't catch the problem.
While third-party software may be causing the problems, the headlines will still read users had problems with Leopard.
For Apple, it has to deal with the ignominy of a flagship software launch resulting in a problem that resembled one of the most ridiculed phenomena in Windows.
It left me wishing it had been any colour but blue. Black or red, yes. But blue is a state synonymous with the flaky image of certain older versions of Windows.
The fact Apple mocked the BSOD in its representation of a networked Windows PC in Leopard won't help. Publicly making fun of its competitors, in particular Microsoft, has been a malaise spreading among Apple execs in recent years. It may be funny but it's not particularly becoming. Perhaps this episode will teach Apple a little humility.
The other profound irritation for Apple is the affected programs seek to alter the appearance of OS X - even though Apple has gone to great lengths to get the fine details just right.
The blue screen problems are unlikely to have a significant effect on Mac sales. Analysts are predicting sales of Leopard are likely to be double those of its predecessor Tiger. But the blue screen problems on the weekend of the launch are embarrassing.
This month's column was to be about how Apple is clawing back market share at an impressive pace over its competitors, thanks in no small way to its operating system. I was going to review the new features that might continue the trend.
It seems only fair I spend some time with Apple's new big cat to assess what features will help the Macs sustain its remarkable market renaissance.
But at this point a confession is required: I've previously installed Unsanity software on some of my home Macs. Yes, what an idiot. So this weekend or possibly the next, I'll be backing up all my data, creating a bootable external drive and trying to work out the best way of installing Leopard on my machines without running into the BSOD.
Expect a proper assessment of Leopard and what it means for Apple in a few weeks. It's probably overcautious but it'll take me that long to pluck up the courage to install, which is a crying shame.



Comments
There are 11 comments. Join the discussion
1. anonymous
I have lots of thrid party software on my computer. I upgraded without a hitch. The os is stabile and working beautifully. I have not heard from any of my many Mac friends that any problem was encountered.
2. Barstep
The Blue Screen only affected a small number of users who had installed a system hack on their computers at their own risk.
I have upgraded two Macs with no real problems and the enhancements to both performance and features are well worth the effort.
I've upgraded many PCs and this OS upgrade was child's play compared to the reconfiguring needed with Microsoft software.
3. iJah420
QUOTE
"Overall, the problems will have affected a very small proportion of Leopard upgraders. But it's been a damaging episode for Apple's image and for its credibility."
Damaging to Apple's CREDIBILITY!!
GOOD LORD!
Where does MSFT rate when it comes to CREDIBILITY on the release of an OS?????? VISTA if you can call it an OS?
Does Vista have ANY compatibility issues? COME ON!
Please!
4. anonymous
I moved from Windows to Mac OSX 2 years ago and have never looked back. whilst my colleagues continue to struggle I focus on my work again! The upgrade was smooth and although there are a couple of things that annoy me like the assumption we all want to use coverflow to look at all our files its a good upgrade, but is just a minor revision 10.4 to 10.5 afterall.
5. Seb Janacek
Upgrade went fine (on an Intel iMac and a G4 Powerbook), happy with Leopard although the Dock has to go. Eye candy gone mad...
6. Jon Schmitt
Typical ignorant Mac-bashing.
Exactly how is it Apple's fault if a problem occurs due to a customer using third-party software to modify the OS?
Exactly how many drivers fail to work when Windows software is updated? Why are Dell reinstalling XP on computers when Visat is the current OS?
7. anonymous
Didn't have a problem whatsoever, although a couple of third party software programs failed to work for me. Not a big deal.
And those losing data - ever heard of backing up? All sympathy evaporates the moment I realise they didn't do that.
I find that almost as disturbing as the idiot on another tech site that declared it took 2 hours to set up Mail.
In comparison, my wife uses a Windows XP laptop. It's always going wrong, is difficult to fix but in some ways it serves a purpose. I have even put XP on my MacBook Pro and with Leopard it's even easier to move from one to another. Don't see that happening with Vista.
But, let's not simply 'bash' PC users. If you like your PC, great. Keep using it. If not, get a Mac, use Linux or another operating system of your choice. Simply suggesting that Mac has got it wrong makes me think the author had a hidden agenda.
8. Richard A
No, not "ignorant Mac bashing"... This article is about media desperation to find *any* angle on the story rather than Mac OS *per se*.
I'm not knocking you Seb, everybody is at it this week, but it does seem the stakes are always higher with Apple than with any other vendor. Unfortunately this amplifies issues in the mind of the public.
Maybe you are right - they do set themselves up for it and hubris does come before a fall...
After all, nobody would be too surprised if the new Trabant had technical limitations and only drove at 25mph - we would just tut and chuckle knowingly...
But if the new BMW refused to start because you used a different brand of engine oil, we would never hear the end of it.
9. Chris Anderson
An earlier comment asked why dell are supplying PC's with xp rather than Vista, for the same reason most mac users won't buy leopard yet, Let the idiots buy a new OS, then when the problems have been solved, move to it if it's actually better.
10. Drymartini
Hard drives are so cheap these days its worth buying a new one and doing a clean install for each major revision.
11. anonymous
I thought that maybe the IT press had latched on to a minor problem and made it bigger than it was for the sake of "news", but then read a full page article in one of our local (Sydney) newspapers where a non-tech journalist spent her whole article detailing her upgrade problems (complete BSOD - hassles with support, and a queue of similarly affected people at the local Mac support location).
She hadn't done a backup (as I suspect most non-tech people wouldn't - they just assume it will work - like their Telivision... "it's a Mac, after all!"). This was the first time I've seen this journalist write about anything technical and she wasn't happy.
I don't have any axe to grind either way, but I thought the Mac adds where beneath the dignity level they ought to have been -- so I think fair enough, the Mac community has what it deserves... I hope they learn.
If you had a good experience with your upgrade - lucky you... and it is luck.