Five reasons why Chrome will crash and burn

News analysis: Another Google Video in the making?

NEWS

Google dipped its mighty toe into the increasingly crowded world of internet browsers today with the announcement of its open source offering, Chrome.

After all the polished promises of a streamlined new way to tame the web, the blogosphere was ready to predict Chrome would inspire everything from the end of Firefox to the demise of Microsoft itself.

silicon.com spoke to industry experts and Google's new rivals to find out why Chrome matters and whether the browser reality can deliver on the hype.

Internet Explorer's stranglehold

The average computer user tends to lack the technical know-how or motivation to change from their default browser, Internet Explorer, giving Microsoft around 60 per cent of the market without even trying. Despite being the only really viable alternative to IE's domination, Firefox has struggled to gain above 20 per cent of the market.

In spite of Google's huge brand leverage analysts feel Chrome could still struggle to gain a foothold when faced with consumers who prefer to stick with what they know.

David Mitchell, VP for IT research at analysts Ovum, said: "Internet Explorer is still used by about 60 to 70 per cent of people and there is a big chunk of the population who are remarkably reticent to change platform.

"I think that Google will grab market share but whether they will knock IE off the top spot is another scenario."

Microsoft itself is confident of IE's unassailability. The company said: "The browser landscape is highly competitive but people will choose Internet Explorer 8 for the way it puts the services they want right at their fingertips, respects their personal choices about how they want to browse and puts them in control of their personal data online."

Bad track record

Despite Google's search dominance, its other homegrown applications have failed to attract anywhere near the same popularity.

It was one of the first companies to enter the social networking market with orkut but the site remains largely unknown outside of Brazil, and despite being launched before YouTube, Google Video always failed to match its popularity, eventually forcing Google to buy up its rival.

Similarly, despite being perhaps the most well-known Google branded app outside of search, Gmail still lags behind Windows Live Hotmail.

Nate Elliott, research director at analysts Jupiter Research, said: "In most cases the products that Google has delivered on its own have failed.

"To achieve success they have had to buy in services from elsewhere and not build them themselves."

Google backlash

With the Google brand already ubiquitous worldwide, could the sheer scale of the search giant's reach start to scare consumers? Tor Odland, head of communications for rival browser Opera, thinks the brand's attempted dominance could prompt an anti-Microsoft style backlash against lack of choice.

He said: "You have to ask whether people want to use products and services from only one company. It is a return to the days of Microsoft.

"I wonder how people will feel about being so tied into one company - the one thing that the online world has taught us is that people like choice."

Damage to Google services

Google has traditionally taken a cross platform approach to its services and worked closely with its soon-to-be rivals Opera and Mozilla, and recently renewed a deal with Mozilla that puts Google as the default search in Firefox. Focusing on Chrome could see those all-important bonds start to loosen.

Odland said: "It is important that they keep testing their services for compatibility with other browsers.

"We hope that they will continue to work with Opera and Mozilla to deliver a better internet experience."

Jupiter Research's Elliott believes Google is hedging its bets: "They have given themselves plenty of time to make progress in the browser market while maintaining a strong presence in Firefox."

How to get it out there?

There is also the question of how Google will get Chrome onto people's computers in the first place. Will it take the Apple approach of bundling it with other application downloads as Apple did with Safari and iTunes or Sun's bundling of Java downloads with OpenOffice.

Ovum's Mitchell said: "One thing that has not been made clear is what is their distribution strategy? Are they going to rely on downloads straight from the Google site or follow the lead of Apple?"

Jupiter Research's Elliott said: "Firefox is by all accounts a fantastic browser and still has less than 20 per cent browser share. That speaks volumes about how big an advantage Microsoft has by installing IE on PCs."

On the other hand, see why Chrome may well be the next big thing…

Comments

There are 10 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Philip Jones

    This analysis overlooks one major strength of Google: Their brand.

    There is no other name associated by so many people of so many ages with the Internet. Neither my parents nor my children 'search for things on the Internet', they 'Google them'.

    So while the psychological barriers to adopting Firefox remain large ('Fire what?') to download a 'faster, more secure' browser from those nice people at Google may well prove to be a no-brainer.

    • 2 September 2008 22:25
    • Add comment
  2. 2. anonymous

    These inventions are all good, as they help the IT environment to progress in development. Let's therefore, encourage all by trying them at least, instead of going the other side.

    • 3 September 2008 11:06
    • Add comment
  3. 3. john morrissey

    If I had to guess, I'd say the writer of tis article is approximately my age, i.e. mid-40's, maybe a little younger. Maybe you're missing the point a little.
    1 - We're shaped by corporate existence - what's the non-IE browser share outside the corporate environment?
    2 - You really think 'most internet users' don't know what browser they're on? What's the under/over 35 split on that?
    3 - Distribution - file sharing networks...? A Google link? Please refer to the demographic comment above
    4 - Google backlash? Find someone with a seriously bad opinion of Google and I'll be pleased to meet them
    5 - Open standards - who's not going to work with them, other than MS?
    I'm no Google fanboy but this seems like a really smart move, particularly if they can achieve a base for their apps to have seamless persistence, for those of us that don't live in continuous wifi environment

    • 3 September 2008 11:07
    • Add comment
  4. 4. Ashutosh

    "It was one of the first companies to enter the social networking market with orkut but the site remains largely unknown outside of Brazil"

    Well, I disagree... orkut is hugely popular in India.......

    • 3 September 2008 17:40
    • Add comment
  5. 5. anonymous

    In the article the writer said "Similarly, despite being perhaps the most well-known Google branded app outside of search, Gmail still lags behind Windows Live Hotmail." Most of the time you can't even sign into Hotmail. It is down a lot. Then, if you are in another country like me all the time. it pops up in the local language and is hard to figure out about how to change the language. Google is a lot easier. There is just too much to write about for this so I will end here.

    • 4 September 2008 05:12
    • Add comment
  6. 6. Matt H

    I've recently had a new machine and have decided to stick with Vista (mainly because I'm CBA to install XP!) and I've always used Firefox at home because I don't like IE.

    Since Vista SP1 was installed, Firefox keeps intermitantly hanging for no reason! Then I can't kill off the process from memory! IE also does the same!

    I decided to try the Google Chrome, and have to say that so far it's the most reliable well behaved browser I've used! I never thought I'd shy away from Firefox, but after the trouble I've had just trying to email someone with the problem, I've just given up. Google Search and Google Browse will I be for the next few months, maybe until Firefox starts to behave in the way it used to!

    • 4 September 2008 09:24
    • Add comment
  7. 7. anonymous

    Hmm - I suspect most nerds will download it immediately. I did. So far, I'm pretty happy with it - it is faster than firefox, launches within a few seconds vs an interminable wait for IE Safari and Firefox....has a cleaner UI... haven't encountered any problems yet.

    Biggest problem is it isn't cross platform yet

    • 4 September 2008 17:48
    • Add comment
  8. 8. Hugh de Glanville

    Irrespective of the likely success or otherwise of Chrome, it would be nice if a VP/IT for Ovum knew his 'reticent' from his 'reluctant'---an increasingly common casualty of the dumbing-down of our English.

    • 5 September 2008 12:09
    • Add comment
  9. 9. anonymous

    Chrome is moving towards OS independence, but it only runs on Windows.

    Anyone else see the contradiction here?

    • 5 September 2008 14:11
    • Add comment
  10. 10. Peter Pillai

    I agree with the author in that the INTERNET browser market is crowded. I do use Microsoft products and am contented with them except for the high prices it charges. By the way, Firefox is a better product than MS Internet explorer.

    • 7 October 2008 13:33
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters