It's official: Windows 7, no longer a codename

Microsoft - it's all "about simplicity"

NEWS

For the first time in recent memory, Microsoft has chosen to stick with its codename for a final Windows release.

In a blog posting, general manager Mike Nash said the next version of Windows will retain its Windows 7 codename when it is released to the market - a date currently pegged as late 2009 or early 2010.

Nash wrote: "Simply put, this is the seventh release of Windows, so therefore 'Windows 7' just makes sense."

Microsoft plans to give developers at the Professional Developer Conference (PDC) later this month a pre-beta version of the software.

Nash wrote: "For me, one of the most exciting times in the release of a new product is right before we show it to the world for the first time. In a few weeks we are going to be talking about the details of this release at the PDC and at WinHEC. We will be sharing a pre-beta 'developer-only release' with attendees of both shows and giving them the first broad in-depth look at what we've been up to."

Nash said the decision to stick with the Windows 7 name is "about simplicity".

"Over the years, we have taken different approaches to naming Windows," Nash wrote. "We've used version numbers like Windows 3.11, or dates like Windows 98, or 'aspirational' monikers like Windows XP or Windows Vista. And since we do not ship new versions of Windows every year, using a date did not make sense. Likewise, coming up with an all-new 'aspirational' name does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve, which is to stay firmly rooted in our aspirations for Windows Vista, while evolving and refining the substantial investments in platform technology in Windows Vista into the next generation of Windows."

Microsoft has said precious little about what's actually in Windows 7. In a May interview, engineering chief Steven Sinofsky said it would use the same driver structure and underpinnings as Vista. The software maker has also talked about its multi-touch capability.

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Karen Challinor

    well unless it has a substantially lighter hardware requirement than Vista has and also does things that people literally cannot do without I don't foresee any mad rush to get on board with it

    I'm not saying XP is perfect but XP satisfies current requirements, no one besides Microsoft actually needs a new version of windows

    the only things that will prise the majority of people away from earlier versions of windows are hardware incompatability issues when replacing failed equipment or the bundling of the latest OS on a new PC

    I doubt this particular revenue stream will be sufficient for Microsoft though

    • 14 October 2008 12:55
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters