White Papers

IP-Multicasting Technology Part 2: Switches vs. Routers

Overview One of the primary difficulties encountered in multicasting over Layer-2 switches (or bridges) is that the normal response to multicast traffic is the immediate flooding of the packets to every interface on the switch (other than the interface from which the packet arrived). This response is typical of a switch when either a multicast or broadcast MAC address is identified in the destination field of an Ethernet packet. If, somehow, the switch could determine which interfaces should be used for egress processing, the amount of unwanted multicast traffic could be drastically reduced. Thus, our question becomes: how can a switch determine the appropriate output interfaces for a particular multicast? To do so, the switch must access the type of information that is available within the IGMP protocol.

Download White Paper

By downloading you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These include information regarding use of your personal data.

Please disable any pop-up blocking software before downloading.

Publisher
Intelligraphics
File Format
HTML
Date Published
May 4, 2009
Format
White Papers
Topics
Multicasting, TCP - IP, Switching

Similiar White Papers

Why Doesn't PIM Sparse Mode Work With a Static Route to an HSRP Address?

Why Doesn't PIM Sparse Mode Work With a Static Route to an HSRP Address?

Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM) is a family of multicast routing protocols that can provide one-to-many and many-to

Publisher: Cisco Systems  |  Tags: data, ip